Connect with us

Business

U.S. Sanctions Hit Firms Across Asia, Middle East Over Iran Oil Links

Published

on

U.S. Sanctions Hit Firms Across Asia, Middle East Over Iran Oil Links

 

In a fresh move to intensify pressure on the Iranian regime, the United States Government has imposed sanctions on several foreign entities allegedly involved in the trade and transportation of Iranian petroleum and petrochemical products, a decision seen as part of Washington’s continued clampdown on Tehran’s funding of destabilising activities across the Middle East.

 

The sanctions, announced by the U.S. Department of State on Tuesday, target companies operating across multiple jurisdictions, including the United Arab Emirates, China, Türkiye, India, and Indonesia.

 

The affected entities, according to Washington, engaged in significant transactions involving the purchase, sale, transport, or marketing of Iranian-origin oil and petrochemicals in violation of international sanctions.

 

The U.S. authorities accused these companies of deploying deceptive practices such as dark shipping and falsified documentation to facilitate the movement of Iranian petroleum products to third-party buyers.

 

Vessels associated with these transactions reportedly conducted ship-to-ship transfers and engaged in activities that obscured their locations in a bid to evade detection.

 

The sanctions were implemented pursuant to Executive Order 13846, which provides the legal framework for the U.S. Government to reimpose restrictions on actors supporting Iran’s energy sector.

 

Washington maintains that revenue derived from these transactions continues to bankroll Iran’s nuclear ambitions, terrorism financing, and internal repression.

 

The U.S. also sanctioned a China-based crude oil terminal for what it described as a demonstrated pattern of receiving Iranian-origin crude from designated vessels.

 

It noted that the activities of the sanctioned firms undermine freedom of navigation and contribute to global instability.

 

The scope of the sanctions extended beyond crude oil to the petrochemical sector, which Washington described as a growing source of illicit revenue for the Iranian government.

 

Several firms based in India, Türkiye, and the UAE were identified as having imported millions of dollars’ worth of petrochemicals originating from Iran over a period stretching from early 2024 to mid-2025.

 

These companies, acting either as intermediaries or end buyers, were said to have played key roles in concealing the Iranian origin of the products before they reached their final destinations.

 

Following the designations, all properties and interests in property of the affected entities within the United States or in possession of U.S. persons have been frozen.

 

American individuals and businesses are now prohibited from engaging in any transactions with the sanctioned parties unless authorised by the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).

 

The prohibition also covers the provision or receipt of funds, goods, or services to or from any blocked individual or company.

 

The U.S. Government emphasised that while the sanctions are robust, their ultimate aim is not punitive but corrective.

 

It stated that individuals or entities affected by the designations could petition for removal from the sanctions list, provided they demonstrate a change in behaviour in line with U.S. laws and foreign policy objectives.

 

This latest move signals Washington’s resolve to disrupt Iran’s energy-related revenue networks and enforce international norms concerning the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and support for global security.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Gold Rush Chaos Rocks Northwestern Zambia

Published

on

Gold Rush Chaos Rocks Northwestern Zambia

 

A sudden gold rush in northwestern Zambia has degenerated into violence as thousands of fortune seekers stormed the region following viral social media claims that the precious metal could be easily found beneath the surface.

 

The unverified reports, which spread rapidly earlier this year, triggered a massive influx of people from different parts of Zambia and neighbouring countries, overwhelming local communities and sparking tension with security forces.

 

According to reports, hundreds of police officers deployed to the area to curb illegal mining activities were confronted by hostile miners.

 

Some officers were also accused of collecting bribes from the illegal operators, further fuelling public outrage and mistrust.

 

In a swift move to restore order, a delegation of senior government officials, including the Minister of Defence and the Minister of Home Affairs, visited the affected communities to assess the situation and engage with local leaders.

 

A government statement described the unrest as “unacceptable” and warned against spreading false information capable of inciting violence.

 

Authorities also assured residents of their commitment to ensuring peace and protecting legitimate mining operations.

 

Officials said the chaos was largely driven by misleading social media posts suggesting that gold deposits were easily accessible in the area.

 

The posts prompted thousands to abandon their livelihoods in search of quick wealth, leading to illegal mining and lawlessness.

 

Experts have warned that such misinformation can have devastating consequences, including environmental destruction and loss of lives.

 

They also noted that the growing trend of unregulated artisanal mining across Zambia poses a serious challenge to sustainable development.

 

Zambia has witnessed several gold rush incidents in recent years, driven by rising global demand for the commodity and limited economic opportunities in rural communities.

 

Analysts say the latest unrest reiterates the need for the government to strengthen control over the mining sector, improve public awareness, and create safer opportunities for artisanal miners within a regulated framework.

 

Authorities have since intensified security presence in the region and appealed to residents to cooperate with law enforcement agencies to restore peace and normalcy.

Continue Reading

Business

U.S. Yields to Pressure, Drops Mali from Visa Bond List

Published

on

Trump Revamps US-Africa Relationship

U.S. Yields to Pressure, Drops Mali from Visa Bond List

 

The United States has quietly withdrawn Mali from its controversial Visa Bond Pilot Programme, ending weeks of diplomatic tension with the West African nation just days before the policy was due to take effect.

 

In an update released on October 23, 2025, the U.S. Department of State confirmed that only six African countries — Mauritania, São Tomé and Príncipe, Tanzania, The Gambia, Malawi, and Zambia, remain subject to the visa-bond requirement, with implementation dates ranging from August to October 2025.

 

Mali, which was initially included in the October 8 listing, was noticeably omitted from the revised roster, a move interpreted by observers as a diplomatic backtrack following Bamako’s strong response.

 

According to the State Department, the initiative is backed by Section 221(g)(3) of the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and the Temporary Final Rule governing the pilot scheme.

 

It said the decision was informed by data from the Department of Homeland Security on B-1/B-2 visa overstay rates among nationals of selected countries.

 

The visa-bond policy, which empowers U.S. consular officers to demand a refundable bond of up to $15,000 from certain visa applicants to guarantee their return, had sparked immediate outrage in Bamako.

 

Malian authorities denounced the measure as unfair and discriminatory, arguing that it singled out their citizens without justifiable cause.

 

In a rare show of diplomatic defiance, the Malian government responded by introducing a reciprocal visa-bond rule targeting U.S. travellers.

 

That tit-for-tat decision appeared to have forced Washington’s hand. With the potential for a full-blown diplomatic rift looming, the U.S. eventually removed Mali from the list, easing tensions between the two countries.

 

Analysts say the U.S. retreat underscores Washington’s desire to avoid deepening hostilities with Mali, which in recent years has redefined its foreign alliances and taken a more assertive stance in global diplomacy.

 

Bamako’s firm response, they argue, signalled its readiness to confront what it perceives as unilateral or prejudicial policy moves.

 

By stepping back, the U.S. has effectively prevented a visa-related dispute from escalating into a broader diplomatic impasse, even as other African countries remain under the visa-bond scheme.

 

Continue Reading

Business

Finally, US, China End Trade War

Published

on

Finally, US, China End Trade War

 

The United States and China have reached a framework agreement for a potential trade deal expected to be finalised when both leaders, President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping, meet later this week in South Korea.

 

US Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, disclosed this during an interview with CBS, the BBC’s US news partner, saying the agreement covers a “final deal” on TikTok’s US operations and a deferral of China’s tightened restrictions on rare earth mineral exports.

 

He added that he does not expect the 100 per cent tariff earlier threatened by President Trump on Chinese goods to take effect, while China will resume large-scale purchases of US soybeans.

 

“We have reached a substantial framework for the two leaders,” Bessent said. “The tariffs will be averted.”

 

The development comes as both nations seek to prevent a fresh escalation in the trade war between the world’s two largest economies.

 

Bessent met senior Chinese trade officials on the sidelines of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Summit in Malaysia, which President Trump also attended as part of his Asian tour.

 

In a statement, the Chinese government confirmed that both sides held “constructive discussions” and “reached a basic consensus on arrangements to address their respective concerns.”

 

“Both sides agreed to further finalise specific details,” Beijing stated.

 

Since returning to the White House, President Trump has reintroduced aggressive trade policies, arguing that imposing tariffs on imported goods would boost US manufacturing and job creation.

 

His tariff measures have led several countries, including the United Kingdom, to renegotiate trade terms with Washington.

 

China has been the main target of the US president’s tariff strategy. Earlier this month, Trump threatened to impose a 100 per cent tariff on Chinese goods starting in November, following Beijing’s decision to tighten export controls on rare earth minerals — essential materials used in electronics, electric vehicles, and renewable energy technologies.

 

China processes about 90 per cent of the world’s rare earths, making it a dominant player in the global supply chain. Its restrictions earlier this year sparked outrage from US manufacturers that depend on the materials.

 

Bessent said China had now agreed to delay those export restrictions for one year while the two countries review their trade terms.

 

One of the biggest casualties of the trade dispute has been US soybean farmers, as China — the world’s largest soybean importer — halted purchases during the height of the trade conflict.

 

Bessent, himself a soybean farmer, hinted that the new framework would ease the pain of American farmers.

 

“I think we have addressed the farmers’ concerns,” he said. “When the announcement of the deal with China is made public, our soybean farmers will feel really good about what’s going on for this season and the coming seasons.”

 

The US Treasury Secretary also revealed that both countries had reached a final understanding on TikTok’s US operations, with Trump and Xi expected to “consummate that transaction” during their meeting on Thursday.

 

The White House had earlier insisted that TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, must divest its US arm over national security concerns. However, Trump has repeatedly extended the deadline to allow for negotiations.

 

Under the proposed arrangement, US companies will control TikTok’s algorithm, while Americans will hold six of seven board seats for its US entity.

 

Trump, who once called for TikTok’s outright ban, has since shifted position, using the app as part of his outreach strategy during his successful 2024 presidential campaign.

 

Meanwhile, Washington announced on Sunday that new trade deals with Malaysia and Cambodia had been finalised, while frameworks had also been agreed with Thailand and Vietnam as part of efforts to expand American trade ties in Asia.

 

The outcome of this week’s meeting between Trump and Xi is expected to shape the next phase of US–China relations and determine whether the long-running trade tensions between both countries will ease or reignite.

Continue Reading

Trending