Connect with us

News

California Governor Gavin Newsom Accuses President Trump of “Brazen Abuse of Power

Published

on

In a televised address on Tuesday night, California Governor Gavin Newsom accused President Donald Trump of a “brazen abuse of power” over the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement efforts, which he claims are terrorizing immigrant neighborhoods in his state.

Newsom warned that “California may be first, but it clearly will not end here,” adding that “democracy is under assault before our eyes”.

The confrontation between Newsom and Trump presents a significant challenge to the 57-year-old governor, whose term in office ends next year.

However, it also offers a political opportunity for Newsom, who has been mentioned as a potential presidential candidate.

According to Darry Sragow, a long-time California Democratic strategist, “This is unquestionably an opportunity for Gavin Newsom”.

Sragow added that Newsom has an obligation to defend California, whether it’s in his political interests or not, calling it “a call to duty”.

Trump has accused Newsom of being “grossly incompetent” and failing to adequately respond to violent protests in Los Angeles.

The President even threatened to arrest Newsom, saying it would be a “great thing”.

The White House is also considering cutting off federal aid to California, including billions of dollars in education grants. Newsom, however, sees the arrest threat as a step toward authoritarianism.

In a related development, Governor Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for its illegal takeover of the California National Guard (CalGuard) unit.

The lawsuit claims that Trump’s actions are an abuse of power and a threat to state sovereignty.

Newsom stated that “Donald Trump is creating fear and terror by failing to adhere to the U.S. Constitution and overstepping his authority”.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Court, Congress Pile Pressure on DHS Over Minnesota Operations

Published

on

US Congress to Review Relations with South Africa, Sudan

Court, Congress Pile Pressure on DHS Over Minnesota Operations

 

US House Democrats have threatened to begin impeachment proceedings against Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem over her handling of the immigration crackdown in Minnesota, unless President Donald Trump removes her from office.

 

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries warned that Democrats could proceed “the easy way or the hard way,” describing the actions of Noem’s department as “disgusting.”

 

The crisis follows the fatal shooting of US citizen Alex Pretti by a federal agent, which has triggered backlash in Minneapolis and led to the planned departure of Border Patrol Chief Gregory Borvino and some agents from the city.

 

Trump has deployed his “border tsar,” Tom Homan, to take charge of on-the-ground operations, while a Minnesota judge has ordered acting ICE director Todd Lyons to appear in court over alleged violations of court orders.

 

Trump has distanced himself from claims by senior adviser Stephen Miller that Pretti was a “would-be assassin,” saying he did not believe the victim was acting as one.

 

Video footage shows Pretti holding a phone while filming agents, not a gun, although police say he was a legal firearm owner.

Continue Reading

News

UN Raises Alarm Over ‘Spare No-One’ Rhetoric by South Sudan Army Chief

Published

on

Trafficking: Libya Deports 700 Sudanese Migrants

UN Raises Alarm Over ‘Spare No-One’ Rhetoric by South Sudan Army Chief

 

The United Nations has expressed concern after South Sudan’s Deputy Army Chief, Gen. Johnson Oluny, was heard urging troops to “spare no-one,” including children and the elderly, ahead of military operations in opposition-held areas of Jonglei State.

 

In a video posted on Facebook, Oluny, addressing members of his Agwelek militia, called for total destruction during the deployment.

 

The UN Mission in South Sudan condemned the remarks, describing them as “utterly abhorrent,” and warned that inflammatory rhetoric targeting civilians must stop immediately.

 

South Sudan’s government, however, said the statement did not amount to an official order, insisting it remains committed to protecting civilians.

 

Minister of Information Ateny Wek Ateny said civilians were being warned only to avoid being caught in crossfire.

 

The development comes amid escalating fighting in Jonglei, where forces loyal to suspended Vice-President Riek Machar have seized several areas.

 

The military has ordered civilians, UN personnel and aid workers to evacuate three counties—Nyirol, Uror and Akobo—ahead of an imminent operation.

 

The UN says more than 180,000 people have been displaced by the renewed violence.

 

Meanwhile, tensions remain high as opposition forces threaten to advance towards the capital, Juba, a claim dismissed by the army.

 

South Sudan has been unstable since a 2018 peace deal ended a five-year civil war that killed nearly 400,000 people, but lingering political rivalry and ethnic tensions continue to threaten fragile peace.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Rwanda sues UK over scrapped migrant deal payments

Published

on

Rwanda sues UK over scrapped migrant deal payments

 

The Rwandan government has initiated arbitration proceedings against the United Kingdom, seeking payments it says are owed under the now-abandoned asylum partnership agreement between both countries.

 

Rwanda has filed the case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague, arguing that the UK failed to honour financial commitments contained in the deal signed under the former Conservative government.

 

The agreement, designed to relocate some asylum seekers from the UK to Rwanda, was scrapped in 2024 by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, with the Home Office saying about £220m in future payments would no longer be made.

 

UK authorities insist the policy was costly and ineffective, pledging to defend the case to protect taxpayers’ funds.

 

Rwanda, however, says the arbitration concerns unmet treaty obligations and is seeking a legal determination of both parties’ rights under international law.

 

The PCA lists the case as pending, with no timetable yet announced for hearings or a ruling.

Continue Reading

Trending