Connect with us

News

Controversy Erupts as U.S. Accepts Qatar-Donated Jet for Air Force One

Published

on

Controversy Erupts as U.S. Accepts Qatar-Donated Jet for Air Force One

 

Washington, D.C. — A diplomatic firestorm is brewing in the nation’s capital following the U.S. government’s acceptance of a Boeing 747 from Qatar, intended to serve as Air Force One during former President Donald Trump’s administration.

 

The aircraft—valued at approximately $400 million—was accepted by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and has triggered bipartisan outrage, raising constitutional questions, ethical concerns, and national security warnings over the use of a foreign-donated jet as the President’s official plane.

 

Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell confirmed the arrangement in a statement to Fox News, saying, “The Secretary of Defense has accepted a Boeing 747 from Qatar in accordance with all federal rules and regulations. The Department of Defense will ensure that all necessary security protocols and mission requirements are met before the aircraft is used to transport the President. For further information, we refer you to the U.S. Air Force.”

 

Critics argue the move is not only unprecedented but also dangerous. Lawmakers from both parties expressed alarm over the potential implications of accepting such an extravagant gift from a foreign government.

 

“This plane poses serious espionage and surveillance risks,” said Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas. “We cannot be naïve about the security vulnerabilities that may come with equipment provided by foreign states.”

 

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., was even more direct: “Donald Trump cannot accept a $400 million flying palace from the royal family of Qatar. This isn’t just unethical—it’s unconstitutional and corrosive to American democracy.”

 

National security concerns have also been raised by Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., who cast doubt on Qatar’s reliability as a U.S. ally. “Qatar has supported Hamas and undermined U.S. interests. The idea that we’d entrust our President’s safety to a gift from them is deeply troubling.”

 

Despite the backlash, the Department of Defense has shown no indication of reversing course. Officials have not disclosed whether the aircraft has begun the rigorous retrofitting process required for Air Force One, a transformation that could cost taxpayers over $1 billion and take several years to complete.

 

The controversy has reignited broader debates over foreign influence in American governance. While the deal may comply with technical legal standards, critics say it projects the appearance of undue foreign entanglement at the highest levels of power.

 

“This arrangement is fraught with political, ethical, and constitutional pitfalls,” said Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine. “It undermines public trust and invites speculation about ulterior motives.”

 

Trump, for his part, has dismissed the criticism outright, framing the jet as a patriotic windfall. “It would be foolish not to accept a free jet,” he said. “It’s not for me—it’s for America.”

 

As the controversy unfolds, fundamental questions remain: Will the Qatar aircraft ultimately be certified as Air Force One—and what message does its acceptance send about American sovereignty, ethics, and presidential power?

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Anti Trump Immigration Policies Hit US, Mayor Decries Violence

Published

on

Anti Trump Immigration Policies Hit US, Mayor Decries Violence

 

 

San Francisco Mayor, Daniel Lurie addressed the public following a protest that escalated into violence over the weekend, reaffirming his administration’s commitment to safety and peaceful expression.

 

“My first priority as mayor is, and has always been, the safety of everyone who lives or works in San Francisco,” Lurie said. “I have been coordinating with local law enforcement and city departments throughout the weekend to keep everyone safe during this evening’s protest, and I am with our city’s public safety leadership right now, getting real-time updates from the ground.”

 

The mayor underscored the importance of protecting the right to peaceful protest. “Everyone in this country has a right to make their voice heard peacefully, and local law enforcement will always protect that right and the rights of everyone in our city to be safe.”

 

However, Lurie condemned the turn toward violence that occurred as the protest wound down. “But we will never tolerate violent and destructive behavior, and as crowds dwindled, a group that remained caused injuries to police officers, vandalized Muni vehicles, and broke windows of local businesses. As a result, SFPD made approximately 60 arrests, and the protest has now wound down.”

 

“Violence directed at law enforcement or public servants is never acceptable,” he added.

 

City agencies are now focused on recovery efforts. “We are working right now to clean up damage, get Muni back to full operations, and coordinating across departments to remain fully prepared for any upcoming activities.”

 

In closing, Lurie reiterated San Francisco’s stance on supporting its immigrant communities. “As I have always said, efforts to target members of our immigrant community who contribute to our city, support our economy, and raise their families here make our city less safe.”

 

“We will continue San Francisco’s decades-long practice of prioritizing everyone’s safety by supporting community organizations, investing in immigrant legal services, and continuing to build trust with local law enforcement.”

 

There have been massive protests against Trump’s immigration policies which has seen many persons deported and citizens of countries banned from access into the United States.

Continue Reading

News

Abramovich threatened with legal action over Chelsea sale funds

Published

on

Abramovich threatened with legal action over Chelsea sale funds

The UK government is threatening former Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich with legal action over the frozen £2.5 billion ($3.4 billion) generated from the sale of the club, which has been earmarked to help Ukraine’s war victims.

Finance minister Rachel Reeves and foreign minister David Lammy said late Monday they were “frustrated” by the failure to reach agreement with Abramovich over where the funds of the May 2022 sale go.

The UK government wants the funds to be directed towards humanitarian purposes in Ukraine, but the oligarch insists they be used for all victims of the conflict, including in Russia.

A consortium led by US businessman Todd Boehly bought the Premier League giants after Abramovich was sanctioned following Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, and the frozen funds are being held in a UK bank account.

They still legally belong to Abramovic and cannot be moved without a licence from the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation.

“The government is determined to see the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Football Club reach humanitarian causes in Ukraine,” said the two ministers.

“We are deeply frustrated that it has not been possible to reach an agreement on this with Mr Abramovich so far.

“While the door for negotiations will remain open, we are fully prepared to pursue this through the courts if required, to ensure people suffering in Ukraine can benefit from these proceeds as soon as possible,” they added.

The 58-year-old Russian billionaire bought the club in 2003 and had an estimated fortune of $14.5 billion in 2021.

Chelsea enjoyed their most successful ever period under Abramovich, winning two Champions Leagues, five Premier Leagues, five FA Cups, two Europa Leagues and a Club World Cup.

Continue Reading

News

African Union Condemns Trump Administration’s Travel Ban

Published

on

African Union Condemns Trump Administration’s Travel Ban

 

The African Union has sharply criticized former U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration over its decision to bar citizens from twelve countries—including several African nations—from entering the United States.

 

In an official statement, the continental body acknowledged Washington’s authority to safeguard its citizens but questioned the rationale behind the move, urging a more balanced and evidence-based approach.

 

The AU emphasized it “acknowledges the sovereign right of all nations to protect their borders and ensure the security of their citizens” but insisted that such decisions “should be exercised in a manner that is balanced, evidence-based, and reflective of the long-standing partnership between the United States and Africa.”

 

Representing the interests of 55 African nations, the African Union expressed concern that the travel restrictions could undermine years of diplomatic progress and collaboration between the continent and the U.S.

 

“The Commission remains concerned about the potential negative impact of such measures on people-to-people ties, educational exchange, commercial engagement, and the broader diplomatic relations that have been carefully nurtured over decades,” the statement said.

 

The affected countries are Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Libya, Somalia and Sudan.

 

Other affected countries include Afghanistan, Myanmar, Haiti, Iran, and Yemen.

 

Underscoring the importance of continued collaboration, the AU reiterated that “Africa and the United States share mutual interests in promoting peace, prosperity, and global cooperation,” the commission stated.

 

In its concluding remarks, the Commission urged Washington to adopt a more inclusive and consultative process moving forward. “The African Union Commission respectfully calls upon the U.S. Administration to consider adopting a more consultative approach and to engage in constructive dialogue with the countries concerned.”

Continue Reading

Trending