Connect with us

News

Democrats Target Corporate Pricing Amid High Inflation Ahead Of 2024 Election

Published

on

In a move to capitalize on frustration against companies over inflation, Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bob Casey have questioned Kroger’s rollout of electronic shelf labels, arguing it could facilitate price hikes on high-demand items. This comes as Democrats seek to shift the narrative on inflation, which has been a key Republican talking point.

The letter to Kroger CEO Rodney McMullen also noted the potential for the supermarket chain to grow larger with its pending $24.6 billion acquisition of Albertsons. This move follows years of Republican attempts to blame President Joe Biden for price hikes, which he has attributed to corporate “greedflation.”

For instance, an X account run by House Republican leadership criticized Biden’s economic policies in late May by listing some of the popular fast-food menu items that customers now pay more for at McDonald’s, Chick-fil-A, and Taco Bell. The source of the data is unclear, and McDonald’s has denied that its average prices have risen that much.

Kroger did not say how it will use the electronic shelf labels, but the grocer said in a statement that keeping prices low “is the foundation of our strategy.” “Lower prices attract more loyal customers who help us grow our business,” the company said.

Wharton’s Lamberton said to fend off criticism, companies must do a better job explaining why they have increased costs or renegotiate with vendors. They also have to tell their story better in ads, she said. For example, as families get ready for the first day of school, Amazon and Walmart have advertised school supplies that start at 25 cents. Amazon has run TV commercials with cheeky messages that encourage parents to spend less on their kids.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Court, Congress Pile Pressure on DHS Over Minnesota Operations

Published

on

US Congress to Review Relations with South Africa, Sudan

Court, Congress Pile Pressure on DHS Over Minnesota Operations

 

US House Democrats have threatened to begin impeachment proceedings against Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem over her handling of the immigration crackdown in Minnesota, unless President Donald Trump removes her from office.

 

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries warned that Democrats could proceed “the easy way or the hard way,” describing the actions of Noem’s department as “disgusting.”

 

The crisis follows the fatal shooting of US citizen Alex Pretti by a federal agent, which has triggered backlash in Minneapolis and led to the planned departure of Border Patrol Chief Gregory Borvino and some agents from the city.

 

Trump has deployed his “border tsar,” Tom Homan, to take charge of on-the-ground operations, while a Minnesota judge has ordered acting ICE director Todd Lyons to appear in court over alleged violations of court orders.

 

Trump has distanced himself from claims by senior adviser Stephen Miller that Pretti was a “would-be assassin,” saying he did not believe the victim was acting as one.

 

Video footage shows Pretti holding a phone while filming agents, not a gun, although police say he was a legal firearm owner.

Continue Reading

News

UN Raises Alarm Over ‘Spare No-One’ Rhetoric by South Sudan Army Chief

Published

on

Trafficking: Libya Deports 700 Sudanese Migrants

UN Raises Alarm Over ‘Spare No-One’ Rhetoric by South Sudan Army Chief

 

The United Nations has expressed concern after South Sudan’s Deputy Army Chief, Gen. Johnson Oluny, was heard urging troops to “spare no-one,” including children and the elderly, ahead of military operations in opposition-held areas of Jonglei State.

 

In a video posted on Facebook, Oluny, addressing members of his Agwelek militia, called for total destruction during the deployment.

 

The UN Mission in South Sudan condemned the remarks, describing them as “utterly abhorrent,” and warned that inflammatory rhetoric targeting civilians must stop immediately.

 

South Sudan’s government, however, said the statement did not amount to an official order, insisting it remains committed to protecting civilians.

 

Minister of Information Ateny Wek Ateny said civilians were being warned only to avoid being caught in crossfire.

 

The development comes amid escalating fighting in Jonglei, where forces loyal to suspended Vice-President Riek Machar have seized several areas.

 

The military has ordered civilians, UN personnel and aid workers to evacuate three counties—Nyirol, Uror and Akobo—ahead of an imminent operation.

 

The UN says more than 180,000 people have been displaced by the renewed violence.

 

Meanwhile, tensions remain high as opposition forces threaten to advance towards the capital, Juba, a claim dismissed by the army.

 

South Sudan has been unstable since a 2018 peace deal ended a five-year civil war that killed nearly 400,000 people, but lingering political rivalry and ethnic tensions continue to threaten fragile peace.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Rwanda sues UK over scrapped migrant deal payments

Published

on

Rwanda sues UK over scrapped migrant deal payments

 

The Rwandan government has initiated arbitration proceedings against the United Kingdom, seeking payments it says are owed under the now-abandoned asylum partnership agreement between both countries.

 

Rwanda has filed the case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague, arguing that the UK failed to honour financial commitments contained in the deal signed under the former Conservative government.

 

The agreement, designed to relocate some asylum seekers from the UK to Rwanda, was scrapped in 2024 by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, with the Home Office saying about £220m in future payments would no longer be made.

 

UK authorities insist the policy was costly and ineffective, pledging to defend the case to protect taxpayers’ funds.

 

Rwanda, however, says the arbitration concerns unmet treaty obligations and is seeking a legal determination of both parties’ rights under international law.

 

The PCA lists the case as pending, with no timetable yet announced for hearings or a ruling.

Continue Reading

Trending