Connect with us

News

#EndBadGovernanceInNigeria Protests: A Civil Call To Save Nigeria From Extinction

Published

on

#EndBadGovernanceInNigeria Protests: A Civil Call To Save Nigeria From Extinction

BY COMRADE PHILS

Nigeria, the most populous country on the African continent and a once-promising beacon of hope in the region, now teeters on the brink of collapse. The malaise affecting this vibrant nation isn’t due to a lack of resources or potential but rather a crisis of governance. As corruption, mismanagement, and systemic inefficiencies continue to plague the country, it becomes increasingly clear that Nigeria’s survival hinges on an urgent and uncompromising call for reform. The people, tired of the increasing hardship and the terrible inflation, are reacting with protests tagged #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria.

Nigeria’s Dilemma: The Cost of Corruption and Mismanagement

Nigeria’s troubles are not merely as a result of the offset of global economic downturns or external pressures. At the heart of its woes is a deep-seated corruption, what I often term “endemic corruption” that has seen the nation’s resources siphoned off into personal purses and stifled national progress. The oil wealth that should have been a blessing has instead become a curse, with billions of dollars disappearing into the pockets of corrupt officials. This mismanagement has crippled the infrastructure, crippled the health sector, left the education system in disrepair and is now biting hard on food prices, leaving the bulk of the people in starvation.

Public services have deteriorated dramatically. Roads are in disrepair, electricity supply is erratic yet quite expensive, and basic healthcare is often out of reach for many Nigerians, irrespective of class. The ripple effect of these failures is felt in every facet of society, from the rising unemployment rates to the ever-expanding gaps between the rich and the poor. The stark reality is that Nigeria’s governance issues are not just a political problem; they are an existential threat.

The Security Crisis

The security situation in Nigeria has reached alarming levels. Armed insurgencies, banditry, and ethnic violence have become commonplace. The government’s inability to provide safety and security has created an environment where lawlessness thrives. Citizens are left to fend for themselves, and the state’s inability to protect its people only exacerbates the crisis.

The Boko Haram insurgency in the northeast, the Fulani herdsmen clashes in the middle belt, and the various armed groups in the Niger Delta are just symptoms of a larger governance failure. Not forgetting the Unknown Gunmen siege of the South Eastern part of the nation, where criminals taking cover under the cloak of self-determination agents often sack police stations and military units. When the state loses control over its territory, it not only jeopardizes immediate security but also undermines the very foundation of the nation.

Economic Despair

Nigeria’s economic landscape is equally grim. The economy, once buoyed by oil revenues, now struggles under the weight of poor governance and economic mismanagement. Inflation rates soar, and the naira has depreciated significantly. The business climate is hostile to both local entrepreneurs and foreign investors due to unpredictable policies, the baseless value of the naira against the dollar and rampant corruption.

Unemployment rates continue to climb, particularly among the youth, leading to increased social unrest. Without a significant overhaul in governance, the economic prospects for Nigeria look bleak. The potential for economic growth is stifled by a lack of infrastructure, corruption, and an inefficient bureaucracy that discourages investment and innovation.

*A Government of Elitocracy*

The troubles of Nigeria got multiplied in days following the inauguration of the administration of the current president, Ahmed Bola Tinubu in May, 2023. Largely accused of forcing his way to power, his policies have been squarely elitist without recourse to the majority of the poor citizens in the nation.

He announced his entrance in 2023, by removing fuel subsidy, thereby causing a tripled hike in the cost of petroleum products, in his first day in office without providing cushioning steps for the suffering masses.


The call to #EndBadGovernanceinNigeria that is kick started by the ongoing nationwide protests is not just a slogan but a necessary demand for change. As citizens, leaders, and stakeholders come together to confront these challenges, Nigeria’s future can shift from one of impending extinction to one of renewal and prosperity. The time for reform is now, and the stakes have never been higher.

This unplanned policy and the inability to stabilize the naira rates against the US dollar, transcended into a sudden rise in food prices across the nation.
With a minimum wage of barely N30,000 (less than 20 US dollars) per month, which was recently increased to N70,000 per month, after a long struggle with the organized Labour Unions, Nigerians are expected to curb with, for example, the price of rice which went from N38,000 per bag to N85,000 per bag within the first three months of Tinubu’s regime. This inflation affects every aspect of life in Nigeria. Hence, the raging anger of the people, who have been civil enough to express it in the form of a peaceful nationwide protest.
The Path Forward: A Peaceful Call for Reform
To steer Nigeria away from the brink of extinction, a comprehensive approach to governance reform is essential. This reform must be holistic, targeting the root causes of corruption, inefficiency, and violence. It should include the following critical steps:
1. Anti-Corruption Measures: Enforcing stringent anti-corruption laws and ensuring accountability for those in power is crucial. Transparency in public spending and the prosecution of corrupt officials are non-negotiable steps toward rebuilding trust in governance.
2. Institutional Reforms: Strengthening institutions to function independently and effectively can help curb mismanagement and enhance service delivery. This includes reforming the judiciary, police, and other critical sectors to operate with integrity and efficiency.
3. Security Overhaul: A renewed focus on security sector reform is needed to address the root causes of violence and insurgency. Investing in intelligence, improving community policing, and fostering dialogue between conflicting groups can help restore peace.
4. Economic Diversification: Reducing dependency on oil by diversifying the economy is essential for long-term stability. Promoting agriculture, technology, and manufacturing sectors can create jobs and build a more resilient economic framework.
5. Public Engagement: Encouraging civic participation and engaging the populace in decision-making processes can lead to more accountable and responsive governance. Civil society organizations and media must play an active role in holding leaders accountable.
Conclusion
Nigeria stands at a crossroads. The path it takes now will determine whether it can overcome its governance crisis or succumb to further decay. The call to #EndBadGovernanceinNigeria that is kick started by the ongoing nationwide protests is not just a slogan but a necessary demand for change. As citizens, leaders, and stakeholders come together to confront these challenges, Nigeria’s future can shift from one of impending extinction to one of renewal and prosperity. The time for reform is now, and the stakes have never been higher.
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Israeli PM Netanyahu Seeks Presidential Pardon Amid Ongoing Corruption Trials

Published

on

Israeli PM Netanyahu Seeks Presidential Pardon Amid Ongoing Corruption Trials

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has formally requested a pardon from President Isaac Herzog over multiple corruption cases that have been ongoing for the past five years.

 

According to a statement from the President’s office, Herzog will consider the request only after receiving opinions from justice officials, noting that the matter “carries with it significant implications.” No timeline has been given for a decision.

 

Netanyahu has been standing trial on charges of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust in connection with three separate cases.

 

He denies any wrongdoing and has repeatedly described the legal proceedings as a “witch hunt” by his political opponents.

 

In a video message released on Sunday, Netanyahu stated that while he would have preferred to see the judicial process through to the end, “national interest demanded otherwise.”

 

He argued that the trials were straining the nation and said a pardon could help restore national unity.

 

“I am certain, as are many others in the nation, that an immediate end to the trial would greatly help lower the flames and promote broad reconciliation—something our country desperately needs,” Netanyahu said.

 

He described the court’s requirement for him to testify three times a week as “an impossible demand.”

 

The allegations against the prime minister date back to 2020, when he became the first sitting Israeli leader to stand trial.

 

In the first case, prosecutors alleged that he received gifts, including cigars and bottles of champagne, from influential businessmen in exchange for favours.

 

In a second case, he was accused of offering to assist in improving the circulation of an Israeli newspaper in exchange for positive media coverage.

 

In the third, Netanyahu allegedly promoted regulatory decisions favourable to the controlling shareholder of a telecom company in return for favourable online coverage.

 

Opposition parties have strongly criticised Netanyahu’s move.

 

Yair Lapid, a former Prime Minister and current opposition leader, said that a pardon would require an admission of guilt, a demonstration of remorse, and Netanyahu’s immediate retirement from political life.

 

Left-wing politician Yair Golan described the pardon request as “only what the guilty would seek.”

 

Despite the opposition, Netanyahu’s right-wing Likud party and supporters have long backed a pardon for their leader.

 

Some international observers note that granting such a pardon, especially before a conviction, would be highly controversial in Israel’s democratic context.

 

Israel’s Basic Law allows the president to pardon criminals or reduce their sentences.

 

The High Court of Justice has previously ruled that the president can issue a pardon before a conviction if it serves the public interest or addresses extreme personal circumstances.

 

The issue is further complicated by Netanyahu’s political and security context.

 

Last year, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant over alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during the Israel–Hamas conflict.

 

Netanyahu has condemned the ICC move as “antisemitic.”

 

Netanyahu’s request comes amid persistent public debates in Israel over judicial reform and governance.

Continue Reading

News

Tinubu Sends 32 Additional Ambassadorial Nominees to Senate for Confirmation

Published

on

Nigeria's Patriots Urge President Tinubu To Enact New Constitution

Tinubu Sends 32 Additional Ambassadorial Nominees to Senate for Confirmation

 

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has forwarded the names of 32 additional ambassadorial nominees to the Senate for confirmation, days after sending the first batch of three nominees.

 

In two separate letters addressed to Senate President Godswill Akpabio, President Tinubu requested the Senate to consider and expeditiously confirm 15 nominees as career ambassadors and 17 nominees as non-career ambassadors.

 

The lists include ten women, four in the career ambassador category and six in the non-career category.

 

Among the non-career ambassadorial nominees are notable personalities such as Barrister Ogbonnaya Kalu from Abia, a former presidential aide; Reno Omokri (Delta); former Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Mahmud Yakubu; former Ekiti First Lady, Erelu Angela Adebayo; and former Enugu Governor, Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi.

 

Other nominees include Tasiu Musa Maigari, former Speaker of the Katsina House of Assembly; Yakubu N. Gambo, former Plateau State Commissioner and former Deputy Executive Secretary of the Universal Basic Education Commission (UBEC); Professor Nora Ladi Daduut, former Senator from Plateau; Otunba Femi Pedro, former Deputy Governor of Lagos State; Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, former Aviation Minister from Osun State; and Barrister Nkechi Linda Ufochukwu from Anambra State.

 

The list also features former First Lady of Oyo, Fatima Florence Ajimobi; former Lagos Commissioner, Lola Akande; former Adamawa Senator, Grace Bent; former Governor of Abia, Victor Okezie Ikpeazu; Senator Jimoh Ibrahim from Ondo State; and former Nigerian Ambassador to the Holy See, Paul Oga Adikwu from Benue State.

 

Nominees for career ambassadorial and high commissioner positions include Enebechi Monica Okwuchukwu (Abia), Yakubu Nyaku Danladi (Taraba), Miamuna Ibrahim Besto (Adamawa), Musa Musa Abubakar (Kebbi), Syndoph Paebi Endoni (Bayelsa), Chima Geoffrey Lioma David (Ebonyi), and Mopelola Adeola-Ibrahim (Ogun).

 

Other career ambassadorial nominees are Abimbola Samuel Reuben (Ondo), Yvonne Ehinosen Odumah (Edo), Hamza Mohammed Salau (Niger), Shehu Barde (Katsina), Ahmed Mohammed Monguno (Borno), Muhammad Saidu Dahiru (Kaduna), Olatunji Ahmed Sulu Gambari (Kwara), and Wahab Adekola Akande (Osun).

 

According to the State House, the new nominees are expected to be posted to countries with which Nigeria maintains strategic and robust bilateral relations, including China, India, South Korea, Canada, Mexico, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, South Africa, Kenya, as well as Permanent Missions such as the United Nations, UNESCO, and the African Union.

 

Confirmed nominees will learn of their diplomatic assignments after Senate approval.

 

Last week, President Tinubu had sent three ambassadorial nominees for screening and confirmation: Ambassador Ayodele Oke (Oyo), Ambassador Amin Mohammed Dalhatu (Jigawa), and Retired Colonel Lateef Kayode Are (Ogun).

 

The three are slated for postings to major diplomatic missions, including the United Kingdom, United States, or France, upon confirmation.

 

President Tinubu assured that additional nominees for ambassadorial positions would be announced in due course.

Continue Reading

News

US–South Africa Rift Deepens Over G20 Boycott and Diplomatic Snubs

Published

on

US–South Africa Rift Deepens Over G20 Boycott and Diplomatic Snubs

 

Diplomatic relations between the United States and South Africa have hit an unprecedented low, culminating in a series of public snubs, policy escalations, and accusations that threaten to reshape both nations’ global standing.

 

The latest flashpoint emerged following U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision to boycott the November 2025 Group of 20 (G20) summit in Johannesburg and his subsequent announcement that South Africa would be excluded from the 2026 G20 summit in Miami.

 

Trump’s absence from the Johannesburg summit was not merely a scheduling issue.

 

According to reports, the boycott was a deliberate protest, justified by his claim that South Africa persecutes its Afrikaner white minority, a charge that Pretoria has consistently denied.

 

The move left global observers questioning the United States’ commitment to multilateralism, especially at a forum tasked with addressing global challenges such as climate change, economic inequality, and security threats.

 

Marc H. Morial, president of the National Urban League, noted that “the G20 is a forum where the world’s largest economies confront shared challenges… For the U.S., participation is not optional—it is a solemn duty.” Skipping the summit, he argued, signals that America’s engagement in global affairs is increasingly negotiable.

 

The diplomatic rift, however, predates the summit.

 

In May 2025, President Trump reportedly showed South African President Cyril Ramaphosa doctored videos in the Oval Office, claiming they depicted anti-white discrimination in South Africa.

 

The videos, widely condemned as false, were described by critics as an “assault on truth and an affront to a nation that has stood as a beacon of democratic progress on the continent.”

 

Tensions escalated further on November 29, 2025, when Trump announced South Africa’s exclusion from the 2026 Miami G20 summit.

 

The U.S. president cited alleged human rights violations and revived claims of attacks on white farmers, describing it as a “campaign of dispossession—and even deadly persecution—targeting white farmers.”

 

Trump added on Truth Social that South Africa had “demonstrated to the world they were not a country worthy of membership anywhere.”

 

South Africa’s response was swift and firm. Pretoria rejected the allegations as misinformation and emphasized that the G20 presidency handover in Johannesburg had occurred properly despite the U.S. absence.

 

President Ramaphosa also bypassed protocol by refusing to hand over the G20 presidency to a junior U.S. official, instead conducting the handover at the foreign affairs ministry level, a move widely interpreted as a subtle diplomatic snub.

Continue Reading

Trending