Connect with us

Business

Kamala Harris’ Stance On Student Loans: A Look At Her Career And Potential Presidency

Published

on

Kamala Harris' Stance On Student Loans: A Look At Her Career And Potential Presidency

Vice President Kamala Harris has been a consistent advocate for student loan forgiveness and relief measures throughout her career. As the potential Democratic nominee for the 2024 presidential election, her stance on student loans could have a significant impact on voters, particularly among young adults and those burdened by student debt.

As Attorney General of California, Harris took action against for-profit colleges for deceptive practices, filing charges against Corinthian Colleges and its subsidiaries in 2013. She obtained a $1.1 billion judgment against the defunct chain in 2016. That same year, she joined attorneys general from 16 other states and the District of Columbia to urge the Department of Education to provide relief to students affected by dishonest practices by for-profit schools.

In the Senate, Harris co-sponsored several bills aimed at making college more affordable. In 2017, she signed on to Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Pramila Jayapal’s College For All Act, which proposed making four-year public colleges and universities free for families making up to $125,000 and community college free for everyone. Although the bill did not become law, it demonstrated Harris’ commitment to addressing the issue of student debt.

In 2019, Harris joined her colleagues in reintroducing the Debt-Free College Act, which proposed providing a dollar-for-dollar federal match to state colleges in exchange for a commitment to help students pay for the full cost of attendance without taking on debt. She also introduced the BASIC Act, which aimed to provide grants to colleges to help eligible students with basic needs like food, housing, transportation, and healthcare. Neither bill became law, but they highlighted Harris’ ongoing efforts to address the issue of student debt.

As a Democratic presidential hopeful in 2019, Harris proposed a smaller student loan forgiveness plan than what she eventually supported as Biden’s vice president. Her plan focused on loan forgiveness for Pell Grant recipients who started and operated businesses in disadvantaged communities for at least three years. Although the plan was criticized for being too narrow, it demonstrated Harris’ willingness to think creatively about addressing the issue of student debt.

As vice president, Harris has supported President Biden’s efforts to cancel student loans. She initially backed broad forgiveness of between $10,000 and $20,000 for every borrower, although the plan was blocked by the Supreme Court. Biden’s new plan to achieve broad forgiveness from a different angle is pending, and analysts believe that Harris may try to see it through if she wins the election in November.

Analysts say that Harris’ stance on student loans could influence voters in November, particularly among Democrats and those with personal experience with student debt. A recent survey found that 58% of Democrats and 54% of those currently paying student loans consider forgiveness important. However, support varies based on partisanship and personal experience.

If Harris becomes president, she may also focus on consumer protection and antitrust laws to hold for-profit institutions accountable. She may take greater legal action against for-profit colleges, as she did when she was California’s attorney general. Additionally, she may propose smaller measures, such as eliminating origination fees levied on borrowers when they take out federal loans for school.

Overall, Kamala Harris’ stance on student loans reflects her commitment to addressing the issue of student debt and making college more affordable. As the potential Democratic nominee for the 2024 presidential election, her position on this issue could have a significant impact on voters

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Taxation and the Nigerian Diaspora

Published

on

Taxation and the Nigerian Diaspora

 

For Nigerians in the diaspora, taxation has recently taken on a renewed urgency, shaped by Nigeria’s evolving fiscal reforms and global policy shifts that increasingly touch lives beyond the country’s borders. From London to Atlanta, Toronto to Berlin, conversations among Nigerians abroad are no longer just about exchange rates or remittance channels, but about what the newly introduced tax reforms at home truly mean for them.

 

Nigeria’s latest tax reforms, scheduled to take effect from January 2026, are among the most ambitious fiscal overhauls in decades. Driven by the need to boost non-oil revenue, the Federal Government has made clear its intention to widen the tax base and improve compliance rather than raise blanket tax rates. According to official data, Nigeria’s tax-to-GDP ratio remains below 11 per cent, far lower than the African average of about 16 per cent. This gap has pushed policymakers to rethink how revenue is generated, especially in an economy grappling with subsidy removal, currency reforms and rising public debt.

 

For Nigerians living abroad, the immediate concern was whether these reforms would extend Nigeria’s tax reach to foreign-earned income or remittances. That fear was amplified by online speculation and misinformation. However, the government has repeatedly clarified that foreign income earned by non-resident Nigerians remains exempt from Nigerian taxation. Residency remains the key determinant. Under the revised framework, an individual becomes tax-resident only if they spend 183 days or more in Nigeria within a 12-month period. For the vast majority of Nigerians in the diaspora, this condition does not apply.

 

Equally important is the clarification on remittances. Nigeria received approximately 20.5 billion dollars in diaspora remittances in 2023, according to World Bank estimates, making it one of the largest recipients globally. These inflows support millions of households and often serve as informal social security. The government has stated unequivocally that personal remittances sent to families are not subject to taxation. This reassurance, publicly restated by the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, was crucial in calming fears of an erosion of diaspora support for families and communities back home.

 

That said, the reforms do affect Nigerians abroad who maintain economic ties with Nigeria. Rental income from properties, dividends from Nigerian companies, business profits and capital gains derived within Nigeria remain taxable. What has changed is the effort to streamline rates and enforcement. Under the new structure, individuals earning up to ₦800,000 annually in Nigeria are exempt from personal income tax, while higher income brackets attract progressive rates of up to 25 per cent. For diaspora investors, this clarity offers both reassurance and responsibility.

 

Yet taxation for Nigerians abroad is not shaped by Nigeria alone. Developments in host countries also matter. In the United States, for example, proposed legislation to impose an excise tax on outbound remittances has raised concerns among immigrant communities, including Nigerians. While still under debate, such proposals highlight how diaspora Nigerians can face additional financial pressure even when Nigeria itself does not tax remittances. These external policies complicate the already delicate balance between supporting home and meeting obligations abroad.

 

Beyond the figures and laws lies a deeper emotional dimension. Many Nigerians in the diaspora already shoulder what feels like an unspoken tax through remittances, school fees for relatives, medical bills and community obligations. When new fiscal policies are announced, the question is rarely about refusal to contribute but about trust. Diaspora Nigerians want assurance that taxation is tied to accountability, improved infrastructure and governance reforms that justify continued engagement.

 

Tax policy also influences long-term decisions. Uncertainty or perceived hostility can discourage diaspora investment, while transparent and predictable systems can attract it. Nigeria’s diaspora population is estimated at over 15 million people, with significant skills, capital and global networks. How taxation is framed and implemented will shape whether this community feels like partners in national development or distant revenue targets.

 

For second-generation Nigerians born abroad, the issue is even more symbolic. Their connection to Nigeria is often cultural rather than administrative. If engagement with the country is defined largely by obligations without visible benefits, the risk is gradual disengagement. Taxation, therefore, becomes a measure of how Nigeria defines citizenship in a globalised world.

 

In the end, the newly introduced tax reforms present both reassurance and reflection for Nigerians in the diaspora. They confirm that foreign-earned income and personal remittances remain protected, while reinforcing the principle that income generated in Nigeria carries responsibility. More importantly, they reopen a broader conversation about trust, inclusion and mutual benefit. For Nigerians abroad, tax is no longer just a line in a policy document; it is a mirror of how connected they remain to the country they still call home.

Continue Reading

Business

Royal Navy Intercepts Russian Warship Amid Surge in Moscow’s Naval Activity

Published

on

US Officials Thwart Russian AI-Powered Disinformation Operation On Social Media Platforms

Royal Navy Intercepts Russian Warship Amid Surge in Moscow’s Naval Activity

 

The United Kingdom says it is witnessing a sharp uptick in Russian military movements at sea, as the Royal Navy confirmed the interception of a Russian corvette and tanker transiting through the English Channel.

 

The UK Ministry of Defence, in a statement on Saturday, disclosed that Russian naval operations around British waters have risen by 30 per cent in the last two years, a development officials described as “noteworthy and concerning” given the current geopolitical climate.

 

According to the ministry, HMS Severn, a Royal Navy patrol ship, shadowed the Russian corvette RFN Stoikiy and its support tanker Yelnya as the vessels made their way close to UK waters.

 

The British crew maintained contact until the ships approached the French coastline, where surveillance duties were formally handed over to a NATO ally in line with long-standing maritime cooperation protocols.

 

This latest encounter comes against the backdrop of rising tensions between London and Moscow.

 

Just weeks ago, a Russian intelligence-gathering vessel was accused of pointing lasers at UK surveillance aircraft operating off the coast of Scotland, an action Britain condemned as “reckless and dangerous.”

 

Moscow, however, dismissed the allegation as “militaristic hysteria,” further deepening diplomatic strains.

 

Security analysts note that the increase in Russian naval deployments fits into a wider pattern of assertive military posturing by the Kremlin in key maritime corridors.

 

In response, the UK and its NATO partners have stepped up patrols across the North Atlantic and Arctic regions.

 

To reinforce ongoing monitoring efforts, the UK has deployed three Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft to Iceland under a NATO arrangement aimed at improving intelligence gathering and boosting situational awareness of Russian submarine and surface vessel activities.

 

Defence officials stressed that while the interception of foreign warships in international waters is routine, the frequency and nature of recent encounters underscore the need for heightened vigilance.

 

“The Royal Navy will continue to safeguard our territorial integrity and uphold international maritime security,” a senior defence source said, adding that British forces remain “fully prepared to respond to any emerging threats.”

 

The UK’s latest move reaffirms its commitment to NATO’s collective defence posture as Russia continues to test Western resolve in contested waters.

Continue Reading

Business

US Government Shutdown Grounds Flights as Air Travel Faces “Trickle” Threat

Published

on

US Government Shutdown Grounds Flights as Air Travel Faces “Trickle” Threat

 

Air travellers in the United States continue to face severe disruptions for a third consecutive day as the federal government shutdown drags on, with Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy warning that flights could be reduced to a “trickle” if lawmakers fail to resolve the funding impasse.

 

According to flight tracker FlightAware, approximately 1,400 flights to, from, or within the US were cancelled on Sunday morning, while 2,700 others were delayed.

 

Newark, New Jersey, reported the longest delays, averaging over two hours.

 

The shutdown, now in its 40th day, has left hundreds of thousands of federal workers unpaid and disrupted vital services, including air traffic management.

 

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) officials had announced last week that air travel capacity would be cut by up to 6% this weekend and 10% next weekend at 40 of the nation’s busiest airports.

 

While international flights are officially exempt, airlines may still cancel some of these services.

 

The root of the crisis lies in a political deadlock between Republicans and Democrats over government funding.

 

Duffy cautioned on CNN that the situation could escalate further, particularly as Americans prepare for the Thanksgiving holiday.

 

“You’re going to see air travel be reduced to a trickle,” Duffy said.

 

“Many of them are not going to be able to get on an airplane because there are not going to be that many flights that fly if this thing doesn’t open back up.”

 

The shutdown has left air traffic controllers fatigued, with many refusing to report to duty due to unpaid wages, forcing the FAA to reduce flight allowances.

 

While Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth offered military controllers as a stopgap, Duffy rejected the proposal, citing civilian certification requirements.

 

Political tensions remain high, with each party blaming the other for the growing chaos.

 

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer accused Republicans of “playing games with people’s livelihoods,” while the White House claimed Democrats are “inflicting their man-made catastrophe on Americans just trying to make life-saving medical trips or get home for Thanksgiving.”

 

Democrats insist on including funding for health insurance subsidies, a condition that Republicans have resisted, preferring a clean government funding bill.

 

Meanwhile, President Donald Trump suggested over the weekend that money be sent directly to Americans to purchase health insurance instead of going through insurance companies.

 

Efforts to reach a compromise appeared to gain some traction, with the Senate convening in a rare weekend session.

 

Republican lawmakers were reportedly working on a compromise package that could end the stalemate, with a possible vote to advance legislation expected.

Continue Reading

Trending