Connect with us

News

A Message To Those Who Seek To Keep Africa Poor: We Won’t Be Fooled

Published

on

A Message To Those Who Seek To Keep Africa Poor: We Won't Be Fooled

I debated long and hard whether to do this publicly, but I think a message needs to be sent to a group of external interests working in tandem with the internal interests described in the quoted tweet to counteract the interests of half a billion West Africans. A message that at whatever level we exist, we take our destiny seriously and we are not to be trifled with.

Last week, I received an N800,000 offer from an international NGO called Dialogue Earth (formerly known as China Dialogue Trust) to write an article essentially saying that Dangote Refinery is terrible for the environment because something something “Environmental Concerns,” something something “Climate Change,” something something “Energy Transition Policy,” something something “COP 28.”

The (unstated but clearly implied) thrust of the brief was for a prominent local voice to put their name on an article that is an argument or a premise for the the Nigerian government to kill the refinery based on its “energy transition commitments” and “environmental policy.” This conclusion wasn’t immediately apparent when they reached out to me, but I suspected where it was heading, and I quickly accepted the offer so that I could see the brief and obtain hard evidence. I’ve attached screenshots from the brief below.

Basically, this London-based NGO is headed by Sam Geall, an Oxford professor and is funded by several American intelligence fronts such as Ford Foundation and ClimateWorks (which is blacklisted in India for funding organisations working against India’s national interest). For whatever reason, it is now quietly mobilising a resistance campaign against what it describes as “Nigeria’s first refinery.” Apparently, the status quo of Africa’s largest oil producer having no functioning oil refinery to beneficiate its own oil was not a problem for Dialogue Earth and the American CIA fronts who fund it.

The human poverty caused by exporting this raw material and importing refined fuel was not bad for the environment. Also, the fact of European refiners regularly blending West African fuel cargoes with toxic waste and sulphur content 200 times the European legal limit (leading to asthma, bronchitis and eye infections in West Africa) was also not bad for the environment. But Nigeria having a refinery that will wean West Africa off import dependency on those European refiners (and allow West Africa control the sulphur content of its own fuels) is where Dialogue Earth and its funders draw the line. That one is bad for the environment, and David Hundeyin should write an article calling for the refinery to be shut down or limited.

I’m putting this out there publicly so that nobody will henceforth use the term “conspiracy theory” when it is pointed out for the umpteenth time, that there are American and European state and private interests that are heavily invested in keeping Africa exactly as poor as it is, and that they regularly push levers most of us do not even know exist, to make sure that this status quo is protected. These people believe that Africans should not exist or have nice things in this world. Apparently, the sole purpose of our existence is to enhance their experience of the planet and all that it has to offer.

It is because of them that I have to make a public spectacle out of this, even though I know that doing this is probably going to cost someone their job. The message needs to be passed that as poor as we are, you cannot convince us to campaign for the elongation of our own poverty by commissioning $500 hack jobs in the hope that we will be greedy enough to only see the money and ignore the bigger picture of what we can clearly see you trying to do.

I will reiterate something I have said multiple times – I am not a believer in the religious faith called Climate Change/ Saving The Environment. I care exactly as much about the environment as do the rich white men who destroyed it to begin with. I firmly believe that if what it takes for Africa to industrialise is for it to burn so much fossil fuel that snow stops falling in Wisconsin and it starts raining concentrated sulphuric acid in Doncaster, it is not too big a price for Europe and North America to pay – it is certainly not bigger than the price Africa had to pay for Europe and North America to develop.

It is and will continue to be 100% OUR prerogative to determine what to do with our hydrocarbons. It is not the rich white men hiding behind these “Climate Advocacy NGOs” who will tell us what to do with our energy reserves, and by what means we are allowed to escape the poverty that they engineered for us.

I might not be a fan of Aliko Dangote or his monopolistic business practices – as is well known – but I’m also smart enough to know when rich white men in DC, Houston, Rotterdam and London and trying to use me as a marionette in their 400 year-old coloniser games. If you are reading this and you are one of the rich white men whose economic interests are threatened by Nigeria refining its own oil, you should come out and fight Aliko Dangote by yourself.

Or at least go find a much stupider African to do your dirty job – there’s plenty of those. It will never be me

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Israeli PM Netanyahu Seeks Presidential Pardon Amid Ongoing Corruption Trials

Published

on

Israeli PM Netanyahu Seeks Presidential Pardon Amid Ongoing Corruption Trials

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has formally requested a pardon from President Isaac Herzog over multiple corruption cases that have been ongoing for the past five years.

 

According to a statement from the President’s office, Herzog will consider the request only after receiving opinions from justice officials, noting that the matter “carries with it significant implications.” No timeline has been given for a decision.

 

Netanyahu has been standing trial on charges of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust in connection with three separate cases.

 

He denies any wrongdoing and has repeatedly described the legal proceedings as a “witch hunt” by his political opponents.

 

In a video message released on Sunday, Netanyahu stated that while he would have preferred to see the judicial process through to the end, “national interest demanded otherwise.”

 

He argued that the trials were straining the nation and said a pardon could help restore national unity.

 

“I am certain, as are many others in the nation, that an immediate end to the trial would greatly help lower the flames and promote broad reconciliation—something our country desperately needs,” Netanyahu said.

 

He described the court’s requirement for him to testify three times a week as “an impossible demand.”

 

The allegations against the prime minister date back to 2020, when he became the first sitting Israeli leader to stand trial.

 

In the first case, prosecutors alleged that he received gifts, including cigars and bottles of champagne, from influential businessmen in exchange for favours.

 

In a second case, he was accused of offering to assist in improving the circulation of an Israeli newspaper in exchange for positive media coverage.

 

In the third, Netanyahu allegedly promoted regulatory decisions favourable to the controlling shareholder of a telecom company in return for favourable online coverage.

 

Opposition parties have strongly criticised Netanyahu’s move.

 

Yair Lapid, a former Prime Minister and current opposition leader, said that a pardon would require an admission of guilt, a demonstration of remorse, and Netanyahu’s immediate retirement from political life.

 

Left-wing politician Yair Golan described the pardon request as “only what the guilty would seek.”

 

Despite the opposition, Netanyahu’s right-wing Likud party and supporters have long backed a pardon for their leader.

 

Some international observers note that granting such a pardon, especially before a conviction, would be highly controversial in Israel’s democratic context.

 

Israel’s Basic Law allows the president to pardon criminals or reduce their sentences.

 

The High Court of Justice has previously ruled that the president can issue a pardon before a conviction if it serves the public interest or addresses extreme personal circumstances.

 

The issue is further complicated by Netanyahu’s political and security context.

 

Last year, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant over alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during the Israel–Hamas conflict.

 

Netanyahu has condemned the ICC move as “antisemitic.”

 

Netanyahu’s request comes amid persistent public debates in Israel over judicial reform and governance.

Continue Reading

News

Tinubu Sends 32 Additional Ambassadorial Nominees to Senate for Confirmation

Published

on

Nigeria's Patriots Urge President Tinubu To Enact New Constitution

Tinubu Sends 32 Additional Ambassadorial Nominees to Senate for Confirmation

 

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has forwarded the names of 32 additional ambassadorial nominees to the Senate for confirmation, days after sending the first batch of three nominees.

 

In two separate letters addressed to Senate President Godswill Akpabio, President Tinubu requested the Senate to consider and expeditiously confirm 15 nominees as career ambassadors and 17 nominees as non-career ambassadors.

 

The lists include ten women, four in the career ambassador category and six in the non-career category.

 

Among the non-career ambassadorial nominees are notable personalities such as Barrister Ogbonnaya Kalu from Abia, a former presidential aide; Reno Omokri (Delta); former Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Mahmud Yakubu; former Ekiti First Lady, Erelu Angela Adebayo; and former Enugu Governor, Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi.

 

Other nominees include Tasiu Musa Maigari, former Speaker of the Katsina House of Assembly; Yakubu N. Gambo, former Plateau State Commissioner and former Deputy Executive Secretary of the Universal Basic Education Commission (UBEC); Professor Nora Ladi Daduut, former Senator from Plateau; Otunba Femi Pedro, former Deputy Governor of Lagos State; Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, former Aviation Minister from Osun State; and Barrister Nkechi Linda Ufochukwu from Anambra State.

 

The list also features former First Lady of Oyo, Fatima Florence Ajimobi; former Lagos Commissioner, Lola Akande; former Adamawa Senator, Grace Bent; former Governor of Abia, Victor Okezie Ikpeazu; Senator Jimoh Ibrahim from Ondo State; and former Nigerian Ambassador to the Holy See, Paul Oga Adikwu from Benue State.

 

Nominees for career ambassadorial and high commissioner positions include Enebechi Monica Okwuchukwu (Abia), Yakubu Nyaku Danladi (Taraba), Miamuna Ibrahim Besto (Adamawa), Musa Musa Abubakar (Kebbi), Syndoph Paebi Endoni (Bayelsa), Chima Geoffrey Lioma David (Ebonyi), and Mopelola Adeola-Ibrahim (Ogun).

 

Other career ambassadorial nominees are Abimbola Samuel Reuben (Ondo), Yvonne Ehinosen Odumah (Edo), Hamza Mohammed Salau (Niger), Shehu Barde (Katsina), Ahmed Mohammed Monguno (Borno), Muhammad Saidu Dahiru (Kaduna), Olatunji Ahmed Sulu Gambari (Kwara), and Wahab Adekola Akande (Osun).

 

According to the State House, the new nominees are expected to be posted to countries with which Nigeria maintains strategic and robust bilateral relations, including China, India, South Korea, Canada, Mexico, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, South Africa, Kenya, as well as Permanent Missions such as the United Nations, UNESCO, and the African Union.

 

Confirmed nominees will learn of their diplomatic assignments after Senate approval.

 

Last week, President Tinubu had sent three ambassadorial nominees for screening and confirmation: Ambassador Ayodele Oke (Oyo), Ambassador Amin Mohammed Dalhatu (Jigawa), and Retired Colonel Lateef Kayode Are (Ogun).

 

The three are slated for postings to major diplomatic missions, including the United Kingdom, United States, or France, upon confirmation.

 

President Tinubu assured that additional nominees for ambassadorial positions would be announced in due course.

Continue Reading

News

US–South Africa Rift Deepens Over G20 Boycott and Diplomatic Snubs

Published

on

US–South Africa Rift Deepens Over G20 Boycott and Diplomatic Snubs

 

Diplomatic relations between the United States and South Africa have hit an unprecedented low, culminating in a series of public snubs, policy escalations, and accusations that threaten to reshape both nations’ global standing.

 

The latest flashpoint emerged following U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision to boycott the November 2025 Group of 20 (G20) summit in Johannesburg and his subsequent announcement that South Africa would be excluded from the 2026 G20 summit in Miami.

 

Trump’s absence from the Johannesburg summit was not merely a scheduling issue.

 

According to reports, the boycott was a deliberate protest, justified by his claim that South Africa persecutes its Afrikaner white minority, a charge that Pretoria has consistently denied.

 

The move left global observers questioning the United States’ commitment to multilateralism, especially at a forum tasked with addressing global challenges such as climate change, economic inequality, and security threats.

 

Marc H. Morial, president of the National Urban League, noted that “the G20 is a forum where the world’s largest economies confront shared challenges… For the U.S., participation is not optional—it is a solemn duty.” Skipping the summit, he argued, signals that America’s engagement in global affairs is increasingly negotiable.

 

The diplomatic rift, however, predates the summit.

 

In May 2025, President Trump reportedly showed South African President Cyril Ramaphosa doctored videos in the Oval Office, claiming they depicted anti-white discrimination in South Africa.

 

The videos, widely condemned as false, were described by critics as an “assault on truth and an affront to a nation that has stood as a beacon of democratic progress on the continent.”

 

Tensions escalated further on November 29, 2025, when Trump announced South Africa’s exclusion from the 2026 Miami G20 summit.

 

The U.S. president cited alleged human rights violations and revived claims of attacks on white farmers, describing it as a “campaign of dispossession—and even deadly persecution—targeting white farmers.”

 

Trump added on Truth Social that South Africa had “demonstrated to the world they were not a country worthy of membership anywhere.”

 

South Africa’s response was swift and firm. Pretoria rejected the allegations as misinformation and emphasized that the G20 presidency handover in Johannesburg had occurred properly despite the U.S. absence.

 

President Ramaphosa also bypassed protocol by refusing to hand over the G20 presidency to a junior U.S. official, instead conducting the handover at the foreign affairs ministry level, a move widely interpreted as a subtle diplomatic snub.

Continue Reading

Trending