Connect with us

News

Court Clears UK Over Scrapped Rwanda Migrant Pact

Published

on

Court Clears UK Over Scrapped Rwanda Migrant Pact

 

The United Kingdom has secured a major legal victory after an international arbitration tribunal ruled that it would not be required to pay Rwanda more than £100m in compensation over the cancellation of the controversial migrant relocation agreement.

 

The ruling ended a dispute that emerged after Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour government scrapped the asylum partnership shortly after assuming office, bringing to a close a policy championed by former Conservative administrations.

 

Rwanda had argued that the UK breached the terms of the agreement and sought compensation for substantial costs incurred in preparing to receive asylum seekers under the scheme.

 

However, lawyers representing the UK told the tribunal at The Hague’s Permanent Court of Arbitration that it was “entirely logical” for a new government to abandon the policy after Labour won power and that no further payments were owed under the arrangement.

 

The tribunal ultimately sided with Britain, rejecting Rwanda’s claims for financial relief.

 

Reacting to the verdict, a spokesperson for the Rwandan government said Kigali respected the ruling and considered the matter closed.

 

The spokesperson, however, noted that a dissenting opinion by Professor Mohamed Abdel Wahab suggested the legal issues before the tribunal were complex and open to differing interpretations, particularly regarding whether exchanges between the two governments in November 2024 had legally altered the financial terms of the agreement.

 

During the proceedings, Rwanda’s Minister of Justice and Attorney General, Emmanuel Ugirashebuja, had argued that the East African nation committed significant resources to the partnership only for Britain to withdraw from its obligations.

 

He also accused the UK government of failing to formally notify Rwanda before abandoning the programme, saying Rwandan authorities first learned of the decision through media reports.

 

The asylum deal was initially unveiled in 2022 by former Prime Minister Boris Johnson and later championed by his successor, Rishi Sunak, as a key measure to deter migrants from crossing the English Channel in small boats.

 

Under the arrangement, asylum seekers who arrived in Britain illegally from safe countries such as France were to be relocated to Rwanda, where their claims would be processed.

 

Successful applicants would have been allowed to remain in the African country.

 

The policy, however, faced persistent legal challenges from human rights groups and campaigners.

 

Its first scheduled deportation flight in June 2022 was halted minutes before take-off following intervention by the European Court of Human Rights, triggering a lengthy series of court battles in the UK.

 

Following Labour’s victory in the 2024 general election, Starmer fulfilled a campaign promise by scrapping the scheme, declaring it “dead and buried.”

 

The government later introduced a voluntary removals programme under which failed asylum seekers were offered up to £3,000 to relocate to Rwanda. Only four migrants reportedly accepted the offer.

 

Responding to the tribunal’s decision, a UK government spokesperson said ministers had successfully defended Britain’s position and remained focused on tightening border controls and reducing illegal migration.

 

“We are focused on delivering vital reforms to restore order and control to our borders, including removing the incentives drawing illegal migrants to Britain and scaling up removals of those with no right to be here,” the spokesperson said.

 

The ruling also reignited political debate in Britain, with Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp welcoming the verdict while criticising Labour for abandoning the Rwanda scheme.

 

Philp argued that the cancellation had contributed to record levels of illegal Channel crossings and asylum applications.

 

But refugee advocates maintained that the policy was ineffective. Imran Hussain, Director of External Affairs at the Refugee Council, said the programme created confusion within the asylum system by delaying decisions and leaving applicants in limbo.

 

He urged the government to prioritise a faster and more efficient asylum process capable of determining quickly who should remain in Britain and who should be returned to their home countries.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

US Threatens New Tariffs on UK, EU, China, 57 Others

Published

on

Trump Requests Postponement Of Sentencing In Hush Money Case Until After Presidential Election

US Threatens New Tariffs on UK, EU, China, 57 Others

 

The United States has announced plans to impose fresh tariffs of between 10 and 12.5 per cent on imports from dozens of countries over concerns that they have failed to do enough to curb the trade in goods produced through forced labour.

 

The move marks the second major tariff initiative by the administration of President Donald Trump since the US Supreme Court struck down a significant portion of his earlier import duties in February.

 

According to the US Trade Department, the proposed tariffs would affect 60 trading partners that collectively account for almost all goods imported into the United States.

 

The department said the measures were aimed at countries that have either failed to prohibit the importation of goods made with forced labour or have not effectively enforced existing restrictions.

 

Announcing the proposal, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the continued trade in goods linked to forced labour created unfair competition for American workers.

 

“It creates a dynamic where American workers are forced to compete globally on an unlevel playing field,” Greer stated.

 

The proposed tariffs have yet to take effect, as the Trump administration is expected to complete the necessary legal and regulatory processes before implementation.

 

The action follows an investigation launched in March by Greer into whether major US trading partners had taken adequate measures to prevent the importation of products made wholly or partly through forced labour.

 

Findings from the investigation indicated that 54 countries had “failed to impose a legal prohibition on the importation of goods produced wholly or in part with forced labour and to effectively enforce such a prohibition.”

 

The report further stated that six trading partners — the European Union, Canada, Ecuador, Indonesia, Mexico and Pakistan — had failed to effectively enforce existing bans on imports linked to forced labour.

 

Under the proposal, a 10 per cent tariff would be imposed on imports from countries and blocs including the European Union, United Kingdom, Canada, Mexico, Pakistan, Argentina, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Guatemala, Malaysia and Taiwan.

 

The remaining 45 countries, including China and India, would face higher duties of 12.5 per cent.

 

Reacting to the announcement, the British government maintained that it was taking steps to address forced labour concerns within supply chains, while China rejected allegations that goods produced through forced labour were entering global markets.

 

The European Union, however, described the proposed tariffs as unjustified.

 

An Indian trade analyst characterised the move as a pressure tactic aimed at strengthening Washington’s position in ongoing trade negotiations with New Delhi.

Continue Reading

News

Israeli Airstrikes Hit Beirut, Kill Two Despite Fragile Ceasefire

Published

on

Israeli Airstrikes Hit Beirut, Kill Two Despite Fragile Ceasefire

 

Israel on Sunday launched airstrikes on southern Beirut, marking the first attack on the Lebanese capital since a ceasefire brokered by the United States last week, as tensions between Israel, Hezbollah and Iran continued to escalate.

 

Lebanon’s Ministry of Health said two people were killed and at least 20 others injured, including women and children, after Israeli warplanes struck two apartment buildings in Beirut’s southern suburb of Dahieh, a stronghold of the Iran-backed Hezbollah movement.

 

The strikes came amid renewed hostilities following a wave of missile attacks launched by Iran against Israel on Sunday night, which Tehran said was retaliation for increasing Israeli military operations in southern Lebanon and the outskirts of Beirut.

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended the attacks, saying the targets were Hezbollah facilities operating within the Lebanese capital.

 

“We struck terrorist headquarters in the Dahieh district of Beirut in response to Hezbollah’s firing at Israeli territory,” Netanyahu said.

 

The latest bombardment shattered the lower floors of a residential building, leaving apartments exposed and scattering debris, concrete and twisted metal across nearby streets.

 

Videos circulating on social media showed residents and emergency responders rushing to the scene to rescue victims trapped beneath the rubble.

 

Health officials in Lebanon confirmed that four women and four children were among those injured in the attack.

 

An Arabic-language statement issued by an Israeli military spokesman on X indicated that the operation could continue, describing the targeted sites as Hezbollah military infrastructure.

 

“To be continued,” the spokesman wrote.

 

The Israeli military also announced that it intercepted two projectiles fired from Lebanon into Israeli territory earlier on Sunday.

 

Hezbollah later claimed responsibility for rocket attacks targeting Israeli artillery positions at Yiftah Barracks and troops stationed near al-Marj Pond.

 

The group said the attacks were carried out in response to what it described as repeated Israeli violations of the ceasefire and continued assaults on villages in southern Lebanon.

 

Reacting to the Beirut strikes, Iranian lawmaker and foreign policy committee spokesman Ebrahim Rezaie warned that Israel would face consequences.

 

He said Iran would deliver a “decisive and painful response” to the attack.

 

The renewed violence threatens a fragile truce reached on June 3 after intense diplomatic efforts led by Washington and supported by Qatar.

 

Prior to the ceasefire, Israel had threatened a major offensive in Dahieh, prompting thousands of residents to flee the area and triggering urgent diplomatic interventions aimed at preventing a wider regional conflict.

 

United States President Donald Trump had previously announced that there would be “no troops going to Beirut” following discussions with Netanyahu, while Washington reportedly urged Israel to exercise restraint.

Continue Reading

News

Iran Launches Fresh Missile Barrage on Israel, Vows “Full Week of Continuous Strikes”

Published

on

Iran Launches Fresh Missile Barrage on Israel, Vows “Full Week of Continuous Strikes”

 

Iran has fired multiple waves of missiles towards northern Israel in a sharp escalation of regional tensions, with Tehran warning that the attacks mark “the beginning of a full week of continuous strikes.”

 

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said the operation would continue in waves, signalling a prolonged confrontation as fears grow of a wider Middle East conflict.

 

However, most of the incoming missiles were reportedly intercepted by Israel’s air defence systems, with authorities later allowing residents to leave shelters. No immediate casualties were reported.

 

The Israeli military said it is prepared for a forceful response, with its chief of staff warning that the country would “strike the enemy with determination as soon as the order is given.”

 

A military spokesman also described Iran’s action as a “grave mistake,” amid mounting pressure on Israel’s leadership to respond decisively.

 

The latest exchange follows earlier Israeli strikes on Hezbollah-linked targets in southern Beirut, a move that further inflamed regional tensions and raised expectations of retaliation from Iran and its allies.

 

The developments have intensified concerns over the widening scope of the conflict across multiple fronts in the Middle East.

 

According to reports from Fox News, United States President Donald Trump urged Iran to de-escalate, saying: “That’s enough. Get back to the table.”

 

He was also quoted as expressing displeasure over Israel’s strikes in Beirut, telling the network he was “not happy” about the escalation.

Continue Reading

Trending