Connect with us

News

Nnamdi Kanu’s Detention is ‘Theatre of the Absurd’ — Defence Counsel 

Published

on

Nnamdi Kanu’s Detention is ‘Theatre of the Absurd’ — Defence Counsel 

 

A member of the legal team defending the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, Barrister Onyedikachi Ifedi, has faulted the Federal Government’s handling of Kanu’s trial, describing it as a “propaganda-driven theatre” with no legal foundation.

 

In a strongly worded statement on Sunday titled “The real theatre is in Abuja, not IPOB: A legal demolition of the ‘theatrical search for Nnamdi Kanu’s acquittal’ propaganda”, Ifedi accused the government of sponsoring media campaigns against IPOB while clinging to what he termed “dead charges.”

 

He dismissed a recent article published under the headline “IPOB’s theatrical search for Nnamdi Kanu’s acquittal”, branding it “the very definition of political theatre” pushed by “faceless writers hiding under government mouthpieces.”

 

The lawyer argued that Kanu’s continued detention violates both domestic and international law, citing his abduction from Kenya in June 2021 in what he described as “a classic case of extraordinary rendition.”

 

He pointed to the Court of Appeal judgment in FRN v. Kanu (CA/ABJ/CR/625/2022) delivered on October 13, 2022, which nullified proceedings against Kanu on the grounds that his rendition breached his fundamental rights.

 

“Instead of respecting this binding judgment, the Nigerian Supreme Court somersaulted in its December 15, 2023 ruling, violating centuries of settled law by remitting a case already nullified. That, dear reader, is the real theatre,” Ifedi said.

 

He further accused the Federal Government of prosecuting Kanu under the repealed Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act 2013, noting that Section 49 of the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act 2022 had already invalidated it.

 

“Every count predicated on the TPAA 2013 is a legal corpse. Yet the Nigerian judiciary continues to entertain it. That is theatre of the absurd,” he declared, citing Supreme Court precedent in FRN v. Ifegwu (2003), which held that offences under a repealed law cannot stand.

 

On the substantive charges, Ifedi maintained that the government has failed to establish even the most basic elements of a criminal case.

 

“No victim. No weapon. No violent act attributed personally to Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. At best, there are speeches and broadcasts — constitutionally protected under Section 39 of the 1999 Constitution and Article 9 of the African Charter,” he argued, referencing Nwankwo v. State (1983) which held that mere expression of opinion cannot constitute a crime.

 

The lawyer also insisted that any appellate discharge of Kanu amounts to acquittal in law, citing Abacha v. State (2002) and Ezeze v. State (2004).

 

“Since the charges are founded on a repealed statute and brought in violation of jurisdiction through extraordinary rendition, any order of ‘discharge’ by an appellate court is in law an acquittal. To call it otherwise would expose Kanu to double jeopardy, which Section 36(9) of the 1999 Constitution forbids,” he said.

 

Ifedi concluded by saying that the “real theatrics” lie not in IPOB’s agitation but in Abuja’s legal gymnastics.

 

“Theatrics are not in IPOB’s demand for acquittal. The real theatrics are: a Supreme Court upholding a repealed law, a prosecution without evidence, a government committing international crimes yet sitting in judgment over its victim, and propaganda outlets hiding under faceless authorship,” he said.

 

Kanu has been in the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS) since June 2021, with his case continuing to stir political, legal, and diplomatic controversy.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

US Threatens New Tariffs on UK, EU, China, 57 Others

Published

on

Trump Requests Postponement Of Sentencing In Hush Money Case Until After Presidential Election

US Threatens New Tariffs on UK, EU, China, 57 Others

 

The United States has announced plans to impose fresh tariffs of between 10 and 12.5 per cent on imports from dozens of countries over concerns that they have failed to do enough to curb the trade in goods produced through forced labour.

 

The move marks the second major tariff initiative by the administration of President Donald Trump since the US Supreme Court struck down a significant portion of his earlier import duties in February.

 

According to the US Trade Department, the proposed tariffs would affect 60 trading partners that collectively account for almost all goods imported into the United States.

 

The department said the measures were aimed at countries that have either failed to prohibit the importation of goods made with forced labour or have not effectively enforced existing restrictions.

 

Announcing the proposal, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the continued trade in goods linked to forced labour created unfair competition for American workers.

 

“It creates a dynamic where American workers are forced to compete globally on an unlevel playing field,” Greer stated.

 

The proposed tariffs have yet to take effect, as the Trump administration is expected to complete the necessary legal and regulatory processes before implementation.

 

The action follows an investigation launched in March by Greer into whether major US trading partners had taken adequate measures to prevent the importation of products made wholly or partly through forced labour.

 

Findings from the investigation indicated that 54 countries had “failed to impose a legal prohibition on the importation of goods produced wholly or in part with forced labour and to effectively enforce such a prohibition.”

 

The report further stated that six trading partners — the European Union, Canada, Ecuador, Indonesia, Mexico and Pakistan — had failed to effectively enforce existing bans on imports linked to forced labour.

 

Under the proposal, a 10 per cent tariff would be imposed on imports from countries and blocs including the European Union, United Kingdom, Canada, Mexico, Pakistan, Argentina, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Guatemala, Malaysia and Taiwan.

 

The remaining 45 countries, including China and India, would face higher duties of 12.5 per cent.

 

Reacting to the announcement, the British government maintained that it was taking steps to address forced labour concerns within supply chains, while China rejected allegations that goods produced through forced labour were entering global markets.

 

The European Union, however, described the proposed tariffs as unjustified.

 

An Indian trade analyst characterised the move as a pressure tactic aimed at strengthening Washington’s position in ongoing trade negotiations with New Delhi.

Continue Reading

News

Israeli Airstrikes Hit Beirut, Kill Two Despite Fragile Ceasefire

Published

on

Israeli Airstrikes Hit Beirut, Kill Two Despite Fragile Ceasefire

 

Israel on Sunday launched airstrikes on southern Beirut, marking the first attack on the Lebanese capital since a ceasefire brokered by the United States last week, as tensions between Israel, Hezbollah and Iran continued to escalate.

 

Lebanon’s Ministry of Health said two people were killed and at least 20 others injured, including women and children, after Israeli warplanes struck two apartment buildings in Beirut’s southern suburb of Dahieh, a stronghold of the Iran-backed Hezbollah movement.

 

The strikes came amid renewed hostilities following a wave of missile attacks launched by Iran against Israel on Sunday night, which Tehran said was retaliation for increasing Israeli military operations in southern Lebanon and the outskirts of Beirut.

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended the attacks, saying the targets were Hezbollah facilities operating within the Lebanese capital.

 

“We struck terrorist headquarters in the Dahieh district of Beirut in response to Hezbollah’s firing at Israeli territory,” Netanyahu said.

 

The latest bombardment shattered the lower floors of a residential building, leaving apartments exposed and scattering debris, concrete and twisted metal across nearby streets.

 

Videos circulating on social media showed residents and emergency responders rushing to the scene to rescue victims trapped beneath the rubble.

 

Health officials in Lebanon confirmed that four women and four children were among those injured in the attack.

 

An Arabic-language statement issued by an Israeli military spokesman on X indicated that the operation could continue, describing the targeted sites as Hezbollah military infrastructure.

 

“To be continued,” the spokesman wrote.

 

The Israeli military also announced that it intercepted two projectiles fired from Lebanon into Israeli territory earlier on Sunday.

 

Hezbollah later claimed responsibility for rocket attacks targeting Israeli artillery positions at Yiftah Barracks and troops stationed near al-Marj Pond.

 

The group said the attacks were carried out in response to what it described as repeated Israeli violations of the ceasefire and continued assaults on villages in southern Lebanon.

 

Reacting to the Beirut strikes, Iranian lawmaker and foreign policy committee spokesman Ebrahim Rezaie warned that Israel would face consequences.

 

He said Iran would deliver a “decisive and painful response” to the attack.

 

The renewed violence threatens a fragile truce reached on June 3 after intense diplomatic efforts led by Washington and supported by Qatar.

 

Prior to the ceasefire, Israel had threatened a major offensive in Dahieh, prompting thousands of residents to flee the area and triggering urgent diplomatic interventions aimed at preventing a wider regional conflict.

 

United States President Donald Trump had previously announced that there would be “no troops going to Beirut” following discussions with Netanyahu, while Washington reportedly urged Israel to exercise restraint.

Continue Reading

News

Iran Launches Fresh Missile Barrage on Israel, Vows “Full Week of Continuous Strikes”

Published

on

Iran Launches Fresh Missile Barrage on Israel, Vows “Full Week of Continuous Strikes”

 

Iran has fired multiple waves of missiles towards northern Israel in a sharp escalation of regional tensions, with Tehran warning that the attacks mark “the beginning of a full week of continuous strikes.”

 

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said the operation would continue in waves, signalling a prolonged confrontation as fears grow of a wider Middle East conflict.

 

However, most of the incoming missiles were reportedly intercepted by Israel’s air defence systems, with authorities later allowing residents to leave shelters. No immediate casualties were reported.

 

The Israeli military said it is prepared for a forceful response, with its chief of staff warning that the country would “strike the enemy with determination as soon as the order is given.”

 

A military spokesman also described Iran’s action as a “grave mistake,” amid mounting pressure on Israel’s leadership to respond decisively.

 

The latest exchange follows earlier Israeli strikes on Hezbollah-linked targets in southern Beirut, a move that further inflamed regional tensions and raised expectations of retaliation from Iran and its allies.

 

The developments have intensified concerns over the widening scope of the conflict across multiple fronts in the Middle East.

 

According to reports from Fox News, United States President Donald Trump urged Iran to de-escalate, saying: “That’s enough. Get back to the table.”

 

He was also quoted as expressing displeasure over Israel’s strikes in Beirut, telling the network he was “not happy” about the escalation.

Continue Reading

Trending