Business
U.S. Government Shutdown Enters Third Week as Partisan Divide Worsens
U.S. Government Shutdown Enters Third Week as Partisan Divide Worsens
The political standoff in the United States has deepened as the government shutdown entered its third week on Monday, with Republicans and Democrats still unable to reach a compromise on a new funding bill to reopen federal operations.
The prolonged closure has left hundreds of thousands of federal workers furloughed, major public institutions such as the Smithsonian museums and the National Zoo closed, and key services like air traffic control under increasing strain.
Despite mounting frustration from citizens and mounting economic concerns, both parties remain entrenched in their positions, showing no immediate signs of compromise.
At the heart of the stalemate is a fierce disagreement over health care spending.
Senate Democrats have refused to support a short-term funding bill unless Republicans agree to restore subsidies under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and reverse President Donald Trump’s cuts to Medicaid.
Republicans, on the other hand, insist that the government must first reopen before any policy negotiations can take place, accusing Democrats of “holding the budget process hostage.”
The impasse underscores the deep mistrust that has defined relations between both parties — now nine months into Trump’s second term.
While recent opinion polls suggest that a majority of Americans blame Republicans for the crisis, neither side has yet to gain a clear political advantage from the standoff.
Standoffs escalated further on Friday after the Trump administration dismissed hundreds of government employees, a move widely condemned as politically motivated and unprecedented in modern U.S. governance.
The White House defended the layoffs as part of broader “efficiency measures,” but critics say it was an attempt to pressure Democrats and consolidate control over key agencies.
Several of the terminations were later reversed after widespread confusion within government departments, exposing what observers described as chaotic management inside the administration.
In a bid to control the public narrative, President Trump assured that military personnel would continue to receive pay, presenting himself as a leader defending national security in difficult times.
He accused Democrats of “holding the government hostage”, saying they were using civil servants as bargaining chips.
However, Democrats have countered that narrative, accusing Trump of politicising the civil service and inflicting avoidable hardship on working families.
“This president is trying to turn public service into a political tool,” Senator Mark Kelly said. “It’s an attack on civil servants and the very idea of an independent government.”
Within the Republican camp, signs of internal friction are beginning to show.
While House Speaker Mike Johnson and Vice President JD Vance have maintained that Democrats are to blame for prolonging the shutdown, some lawmakers — including Marjorie Taylor Greene and Kevin Kiley — have criticised their leadership’s refusal to reconvene Congress to negotiate an end to the crisis.
Party insiders warn that the shutdown could deepen divisions within the GOP ahead of next year’s midterm elections, especially if the public continues to associate the crisis with Republican inflexibility.
Across the United States, the economic toll is beginning to bite.
Local businesses dependent on federal contracts are reporting losses, tourism has slowed, and public frustration is mounting, particularly in Washington, D.C., where government operations remain partially paralysed.
Unions representing furloughed workers have staged demonstrations in several cities, demanding that both sides return to the negotiating table.
Economists estimate that the shutdown could cost the U.S. economy billions of dollars if it extends into a fourth week.
For now, the standoff shows no sign of easing. Both parties appear determined to hold their ground — each calculating that the other will bear the greater political cost of public anger.
Until one side finds more advantage in compromise than confrontation, the shutdown — and the hardship it inflicts — may continue indefinitely.
Business
Africa Loses $75bn Yearly to Risk Premiums, Experts Warn
Africa Loses $75bn Yearly to Risk Premiums, Experts Warn
African economies lose about $75bn annually to excess interest payments arising from high risk premiums, as experts call for fairer credit ratings, improved debt management and greater transparency in global financial assessments.
The Deputy Executive Secretary and Chief Economist of the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, Dr Hanan Morsy, disclosed this during a panel discussion on debt sustainability, credit ratings and Africa’s risk premium at the 2026 International Monetary Fund and World Bank Annual Meetings in Bangkok, Thailand.
Morsy said African governments must provide credible economic data and strengthen their capacity to communicate their economic realities to investors and international financial institutions.
She warned that the continent could not afford to depend entirely on external assessments of its economic prospects, urging governments to support their arguments with verifiable evidence.
“If you do not advocate for yourself, no one will. This applies to individuals as well as countries. You must make your case and ensure that it is not based on words alone but backed by evidence,” she said.
The discussion comes amid growing concerns over Africa’s borrowing costs, rising debt-service obligations and the need to finance infrastructure, healthcare, education and employment opportunities for a rapidly growing population.
The launch of the Africa Credit Rating Agency in Mauritius this month is expected to provide additional perspectives on African economies by incorporating more local data, expertise and economic realities into credit assessments.
However, stakeholders cautioned that the agency’s effectiveness would depend on its independence, transparent methodologies, reliable data and credibility among international investors.
The Director-General of the West African Institute for Financial and Economic Management, Dr Baba Musa, said African countries had spent decades demanding more accurate and proportionate assessments of their economic risks.
He argued that prevailing perceptions of African economies often placed the continent at a disadvantage compared with other regions.
“For a rating agency, the methodology should be comparable with international standards. However, what African countries have been asking for over the past 20 years is that they should be assessed accurately, their risks communicated proportionately, and their economies evaluated fairly,” Musa said.
He stressed that the demand was not for preferential treatment but for assessments that reflected the diversity, resources and economic circumstances of individual African countries.
“Africa’s voice should be heard and the continent should be assessed fairly, just like any other region,” he added.
Musa said the success of the new agency would depend on its ability to apply credible methodologies, operate transparently and accurately reflect the economic realities of African countries.
Business
RWE abandons US offshore wind projects in $1.2bn Trump deal
RWE abandons US offshore wind projects in $1.2bn Trump deal
German energy giant RWE has agreed to abandon its offshore wind projects in the United States under a $1.2bn deal with the administration of President Donald Trump, in another major setback for the country’s offshore wind industry.
Under the agreement, RWE will relinquish its offshore wind leases off California and Louisiana, as well as in the New York Bight, an area between New York and New Jersey that has been regarded as one of the most promising locations for offshore wind development in the United States.
The company said there was no foreseeable path to securing permits for the projects under the current regulatory environment.
RWE said it would redirect its investment towards conventional energy projects, including about $900m for a liquefied natural gas export terminal in Louisiana.
The agreement is the latest in a series of deals under the Trump administration aimed at ending or restructuring offshore wind projects in the United States.
The development reflects a dramatic shift in American energy policy since Trump returned to the White House, with the administration placing greater emphasis on oil and gas production while challenging the expansion of renewable energy.
Trump has repeatedly criticised wind energy and has made increased domestic fossil-fuel production a major part of his energy policy.
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum welcomed the RWE agreement, saying the administration was pursuing an energy system based on what he described as economic practicality rather than dependence on subsidies.
RWE, however, stressed that the agreement did not represent a withdrawal from the American energy market.
The company plans to invest about €17bn over the next six years to expand its power-generation capacity in the United States.
The latest agreement therefore represents a strategic adjustment rather than a complete retreat from the American market, with RWE shifting its investment towards areas it believes can operate under the current policy environment.
In March 2026, the Department of the Interior reached an agreement with French energy company TotalEnergies that resulted in the termination of its offshore wind projects, with the company redirecting investment towards an LNG facility in Texas and conventional oil activities in the Gulf of Mexico.
The administration also reached a $129m agreement with Duke Energy last month that resulted in the termination of the company’s offshore wind lease in the Carolina Long Bay area.
The RWE agreement is therefore part of a broader policy pattern rather than an isolated corporate decision.
The administration has argued that offshore wind projects depend excessively on government support and can impose higher costs on consumers.
Business
Rubio vows US will keep protecting Gulf shipping, says diplomacy with Iran still possible
Rubio vows US will keep protecting Gulf shipping, says diplomacy with Iran still possible
By Boniface Ihiasota, Washington DC
United States Secretary of State, Marco Rubio on Wednesday said Washington would continue military operations to safeguard international shipping routes from Iranian attacks while insisting that the U.S. remained open to a diplomatic resolution of the crisis.
Rubio, who spoke to journalists in Manila, accused Iran of undermining previous commitments by continuing attacks on commercial vessels transiting a key international waterway.
He said Tehran had failed to uphold an earlier understanding that called for unrestricted maritime navigation, arguing that the latest attacks demonstrated Iran was “not serious” about diplomacy.
“We remain open to diplomacy. We remain open to working it out in a negotiated way. But right now, they don’t seem to be serious about that,” Rubio said.
According to him, the U.S. military would continue targeting sites allegedly used to launch attacks against commercial shipping while protecting vessels passing through the strategic maritime corridor.
“Ships are trying to go through the straits, and they’re getting blown up. The United States is defending that shipping and degrading Iran’s ability to target global shipping,” he said.
Rubio also rejected suggestions that Washington’s objective was to force Iran into submission, arguing instead that the U.S. was determined to prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
He claimed Iran had spent decades investing heavily in missiles, drones and proxy groups instead of addressing domestic economic challenges, including soaring inflation and rising food prices.
The U.S. Secretary of State urged more countries to join efforts to secure international shipping lanes, saying many nations depended more heavily on the affected maritime route than the United States.
Although Washington had not made fresh requests during meetings with Asian allies in Manila, Rubio disclosed that previous discussions had explored possible contributions, including naval mine-clearing capabilities.
He maintained that the U.S. would prefer a negotiated settlement but insisted that freedom of navigation could not be compromised.
Rubio also confirmed he would meet Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to discuss the war in Ukraine, saying Washington remained willing to play a constructive role in efforts to end the conflict while pursuing cooperation with Moscow on other strategic issues.
-
Analysis6 days agoFrance in Crisis: Anger and Unrest Shake the Nation
-
Diplomacy6 days agoCARICOM, Türkiye explore cooperation in trade, energy, food security
-
News6 days agoBritain restricts Eritrean diplomats, threatens entry ban
-
Business6 days agoAfrica Loses $75bn Yearly to Risk Premiums, Experts Warn
-
News6 days agoZelenskyy seeks European support as Trump tensions deepen
-
Opinion6 days agoBefore You Collect That Peanut, Remember Your Future, by Boniface Ihiasota
