News
Five Years on the Throne: Reflecting on the Reign of the Olu of Warri, by Boniface Ihiasota
Five Years on the Throne: Reflecting on the Reign of the Olu of Warri, by Boniface Ihiasota
Five years ago, on August 21, 2021, history turned a new page in the ancient Warri Kingdom as Prince Utieyinoritsetsola Emiko was crowned the 21st Olu of Warri and assumed the royal title, Ogiame Atuwatse III. His coronation in Ode-Itsekiri, the ancestral home of the Itsekiri people in Delta State, was more than a colourful royal ceremony. It marked the beginning of a new chapter in the relationship between tradition, modern leadership and the aspirations of a people whose history stretches back centuries.
As the fifth anniversary approaches, the reign of Ogiame Atuwatse III offers an opportunity for reflection, particularly from the perspective of Nigerians in the diaspora. For those who live thousands of kilometres away from Warri, traditional institutions can sometimes appear distant, preserved mainly in photographs, ceremonies and memories. Yet the Olu’s reign has increasingly demonstrated how cultural leadership can remain relevant in a rapidly changing world.
Born in Warri on April 2, 1984, to the late Olu Atuwatse II, also known as Godwin Toritseju Emiko, and Olori Gladys Durorike Emiko, the monarch represents a blend of royal heritage and contemporary education. He attended NNPC Primary School in Warri and Adesoye College in Offa, Kwara State, before proceeding to Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, where he earned a bachelor’s degree in International Studies and Political Science and later a master’s degree in Management.
That background matters. Ogiame Atuwatse III belongs to a generation of African traditional rulers who have had to navigate two worlds: the authority of inherited tradition and the demands of a modern, globally connected society. His years in the United States and subsequent professional experience in Nigeria gave him exposure to corporate institutions and international perspectives before destiny called him home to the throne.
His ascension was itself preceded by a period of uncertainty and controversy. Yet the eventual coronation brought together an impressive cross-section of Nigeria’s traditional and political establishment. Among those present were the Ooni of Ife, Oba Adeyeye Ogunwusi; the Obi of Onitsha, Igwe Alfred Achebe; and the Aare Ona Kakanfo of Yorubaland, Gani Adams.
For the Itsekiri, however, the significance of that day went beyond the presence of dignitaries. It was about continuity. The Olu of Warri is not merely a ceremonial figure. He occupies a central place in the cultural identity of the Itsekiri people, a community whose history is deeply connected to the Niger Delta, the waterways of Warri and the wider story of Nigeria’s interaction with the Atlantic world. The preservation of that identity becomes even more important as younger Itsekiri generations increasingly live outside Nigeria.
This is where the diaspora dimension becomes compelling. For an Itsekiri child growing up in London, Houston, Toronto, Johannesburg or elsewhere, the question is not simply who occupies the throne in Warri. It is whether the throne can continue to speak to a generation whose everyday experiences are shaped by different societies. A modern monarchy must therefore preserve language, customs, history and values while finding new ways to communicate with people who may be physically removed from the ancestral homeland.
Ogiame Atuwatse III’s reign has placed considerable emphasis on the idea that tradition need not be imprisoned in the past. The palace has continued to present Itsekiri culture and heritage as living institutions rather than museum pieces. The monarch’s official biography describes his reign as being anchored in righteousness, justice and the prosperity and wellbeing of the Itsekiri people.
His coronation speech also revealed an important element of his outlook. Reflecting on the difficult circumstances surrounding his emergence, the new Olu spoke of transformation, reconciliation and divine purpose. He described the moment as a new beginning for Iwere Kingdom, while invoking the rebuilding of what had been damaged.
Five years later, that message remains significant. The true measure of a traditional ruler is not the grandeur of a coronation, the splendour of royal regalia or the number of dignitaries who attend palace events. It is the ability to preserve the dignity of the institution while making it useful to the people it represents.
For Nigerians abroad, the fifth anniversary of Ogiame Atuwatse III should therefore be viewed not simply as a royal celebration, but as a reminder of the enduring power of heritage. In an age when migration can separate families from their ancestral homes for generations, institutions such as the Warri Kingdom provide an important cultural bridge between homeland and diaspora.
The fifth year of the reign is consequently both a celebration and an invitation to reflect. It asks what it means to inherit a centuries-old institution in the 21st century, and how that institution can remain relevant to a new generation.
On August 21, 2026, as the Itsekiri mark five years of Ogiame Atuwatse III on the throne, the celebration will inevitably look backward at history. But its greater significance may lie in looking forward—to a Warri Kingdom where tradition remains rooted, identity remains strong and the sons and daughters of Iwere, whether at home or abroad, continue to see the palace as part of their story.
Diplomacy
CARICOM, Türkiye explore cooperation in trade, energy, food security
CARICOM, Türkiye explore cooperation in trade, energy, food security
The Caribbean Community, CARICOM and the Republic of Türkiye have explored opportunities to strengthen cooperation in trade, investment, food security, renewable energy, disaster management and maritime connectivity.
The two sides also identified health, port development and climate resilience as priority areas for deeper engagement during the second meeting of the CARICOM-Republic of Türkiye Consultation and Cooperation Mechanism held on October 12, 2026.
According to a joint press release, the meeting reaffirmed both parties’ commitment to strengthening political dialogue and advancing practical cooperation in areas of mutual interest.
The meeting was co-chaired by the Permanent Secretary in Suriname’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Business and Cooperation, Ambassador Miriam Mac Intosh, and Türkiye’s Director-General for Latin America and the Caribbean in its Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Erkan Aytun.
Mac Intosh, who represents the current chair of the CARICOM Council for Foreign and Community Relations, said the partnership was founded on constructive dialogue, mutual respect and a shared commitment to development.
She commended Türkiye for its support for development projects and humanitarian assistance across the Caribbean, noting that the contributions had delivered tangible benefits to the region.
“We remain committed to identifying and advancing further initiatives that contribute to the Region’s resilience and sustainable development,” she said.
Convened under a memorandum of understanding signed in 2011, the meeting reviewed developments in relations between the two parties and examined opportunities to expand cooperation.
High-level officials from CARICOM member states presented practical proposals covering trade and investment, disaster management, food security, renewable energy, health, maritime connectivity and port development.
Representatives of Turkish institutions also outlined how their technical expertise, technology and institutional capacity could support the priorities of Caribbean countries.
The discussions further examined preparations for the 31st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, known as COP31, scheduled to take place in Antalya, Türkiye, from November 9 to 20, 2026.
Türkiye, which will preside over the conference, presented its strategic priorities and preparations for the global climate summit.
Aytun said the country wanted COP31 to focus on implementing climate commitments, following consultations with participating countries and other stakeholders.
“We need to make COP31 an implementation COP,” he said.
He identified 10 priority themes for the climate action agenda, including clean energy transition and electrification, zero waste and methane reduction, climate-resilient cities, green industrialisation, youth and education, food security, oceans and seas, resilient health systems, synergies among the Rio conventions and a climate implementation bridge.
CARICOM and Türkiye have expanded their engagement over the years through development cooperation, humanitarian assistance and support for regional initiatives.
Recent areas of cooperation include contributions to Caribbean disaster recovery efforts, support for the Caribbean Development Fund and assistance in strengthening the CARICOM Secretariat’s information and communications infrastructure.
News
Britain restricts Eritrean diplomats, threatens entry ban
Britain restricts Eritrean diplomats, threatens entry ban
The United Kingdom has threatened to impose a blanket entry ban on Eritrean nationals if the East African country fails to cooperate with efforts to return migrants who have no legal right to remain in Britain and foreign nationals convicted of crimes.
The UK Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, announced the proposed measures amid growing tensions between both countries over migration and the repatriation of Eritrean nationals.
From Thursday, Eritrean diplomats will face restrictions on their movements outside London, while fast-track visa arrangements for senior officials will be suspended.
Mahmood warned that the British government could introduce further restrictions if Eritrean authorities continued to reject its requests for cooperation.
“Eritrea has had every chance to accept the return of criminals and those with no right to be in the UK. Unlike other countries, it has refused,” she said.
She added that she would not hesitate “to impose further measures on other countries refusing to co-operate”.
The British government accused Eritrea of abruptly withdrawing cooperation earlier this year, making it difficult to return nationals who had been denied permission to remain in the UK.
However, Eritrea’s government rejected the allegations, describing the restrictions as a “perfunctory political gimmick”.
The Eritrean embassy in London also accused Britain of failing to engage in meaningful dialogue and alleged that British authorities had not properly disclosed cases involving nationals who were returned while still serving prison sentences.
It further disputed Britain’s description of some returns as voluntary, arguing that the circumstances did not support that characterisation.
A UK Home Office spokesperson dismissed the criticism, saying Eritrea’s comments misrepresented the British government’s position.
The Home Office also said Britain had granted an exemption from immigration control to an Eritrean official in August 2026, disputing claims that no Eritrean official had received such an exemption since 2023.
The proposed restrictions come as Eritreans account for a significant proportion of migrants arriving in Britain through irregular Channel crossings.
Figures from the House of Commons Library show that Eritreans represented 18 per cent of small-boat arrivals in the 12 months to June.
Home Office data indicated that more than 5,800 Eritreans arrived in Britain through small boats during the same period, while approximately 1,300 were granted visas, mostly to join relatives already living in the country.
Only seven Eritrean nationals were returned directly to Eritrea from Britain during the 12 months to June, while another 244 were returned to other countries.
The figures have raised questions about the likely effectiveness of the proposed restrictions in reducing irregular migration.
Dr Madeleine Sumption, director of the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford, said targeting Eritrea could have limited impact because most Eritreans seeking asylum in Britain were likely to qualify for international protection.
She told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that Eritrea accounted for approximately 7,000 asylum applications in the latest year of available data, representing about eight per cent of the total.
“Most Eritreans who come and claim asylum are not removable at all,” she said, adding that about 84 per cent of applications were successful at the initial decision stage, with further applicants potentially succeeding on appeal.
Sumption said the number of people initially refused asylum would decline as appeals were considered.
Eritrea has faced longstanding international criticism over its human rights record, including allegations of forced labour, indefinite military conscription and restrictions on freedom of expression.
The country, which gained independence from Ethiopia in 1993, has never held a national election since independence and has no independent media.
Human Rights Watch has accused the government of widespread repression, while critics of President Isaias Afwerki have faced arrest and prolonged detention, often without trial.
Indefinite military service has also been cited as a major reason young Eritreans leave the country.
News
Zelenskyy seeks European support as Trump tensions deepen
Zelenskyy seeks European support as Trump tensions deepen
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has praised European leaders for their continued support for Kyiv as tensions with United States President Donald Trump threaten to complicate efforts to secure further assistance for Ukraine.
Zelenskyy made the remarks on Friday during a European summit in Brussels, where leaders were discussing support for Ukraine amid its continuing war with Russia.
“I’m so thankful that we have such huge support from EU Council Commission and leaders – real leaders,” he said, acknowledging Europe’s backing since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
His comments came amid renewed concerns over Ukraine’s military communications following restrictions on SpaceX’s Starlink satellite service, which Ukrainian forces rely on for battlefield connectivity.
Ukraine’s First Deputy Minister for Recovery, Infrastructure and Transport, Serhiy Derkach, warned that restrictions on the service could create additional difficulties for the country’s defence efforts.
“With U.S. limiting the use of Starlinks on the battlefield, Russia feels that this is their moment to try and inflict even more pain and suffering on Ukraine’s civilian infrastructure,” Derkach told CNBC on Friday.
He added that Ukraine was approaching what could be a particularly difficult period and needed support from its international partners.
The development comes as Zelenskyy reportedly faces pressure from some European officials to moderate his public criticism of Trump in order to preserve cooperation with Washington.
Three officials familiar with preparations for the Brussels summit told the Financial Times that they planned to privately urge the Ukrainian president to tone down his rhetoric during their meeting.
Politico also reported concerns among some European leaders about Zelenskyy’s handling of his strained relationship with the US president.
One European Union diplomat was quoted as describing the Ukrainian leader’s public criticism of Trump as “not helpful”.
Despite the tensions, Zelenskyy insisted that Ukraine remained committed to ending the war but said there were no indications that Russia was ready to do the same.
“We want to end this war as quick as possible. We don’t see now signals from Russia side that they are ready for this to end this war,” he told reporters in Brussels.
The Ukrainian president’s comments followed his criticism of Russia over its alleged failure to respect an energy ceasefire announced by Trump.
Trump had announced the proposed arrangement the previous week, saying Russia and Ukraine had agreed to stop attacking each other’s energy infrastructure.
The initiative was presented as an attempt to reduce attacks on critical infrastructure and ease pressure on energy markets ahead of the US midterm elections in November.
Zelenskyy subsequently said Ukraine had refrained from striking Russian energy targets for three days in response to Washington’s proposal.
However, he described the arrangement concerning Russia’s energy-related commitments as weak.
Moscow has not confirmed that it agreed to an energy ceasefire, saying only that discussions were ongoing.
Russian authorities had not responded to multiple requests for comment from CNBC at the time of the report.
The dispute highlights the challenges facing diplomatic efforts to reduce hostilities, particularly as Ukraine continues to depend on Western military, financial and technological assistance.
European governments have maintained support for Kyiv, but concerns over the relationship between Zelenskyy and Trump have raised questions about how differences between Ukraine and its most influential partners could affect the wider war effort.
-
Analysis4 days agoFrance in Crisis: Anger and Unrest Shake the Nation
-
Analysis1 week agoAfrica’s Resources Must Build Africa, by Alabidun Shuaib AbdulRahman
-
News1 week agoTrump’s fuel price cuts face hurdles ahead of midterm elections
-
Diplomacy1 week agoUK, Germany ratify defence treaty amid Russian threat
-
News1 week agoTrump Rules Out Iran Deal as US Weighs Fresh Military Strikes
-
News1 week agoCARICOM assesses regional capacity to produce four key products
