News
Kenya 2027: Ruto’s defiance on power transfer fuels talk of a cornered presidency
President William Ruto’s declaration that he won’t relinquish power to the opposition has intensified fears of democratic erosion and raised questions about whether he is beginning to panic.
Speaking on 17 June in the Rift Valley town of Naivasha, Ruto ridiculed his opponents as “tribalists with no plan” and appeared to mock the idea of conceding defeat. “We cannot hand over leadership to such people,” he told supporters in the west of the capital, Nairobi. However, he later added that leadership is not defined by how many terms one serves, but critics say the damage is already done.
His comments have ignited fears that the president, who campaigned as a reformer, is now laying the groundwork for a disputed election and an unconstitutional power grab. To many Kenyans, his remarks crossed the line. Critics say they signal not just contempt for the opposition, but for constitutional democracy itself.
“Kenya is a constitutional democracy, not your empire,” said constitutional lawyer Willis Otieno, stressing that under the Kenyan constitution, the peaceful transfer of power is not optional: “If Ruto loses and refuses to hand over, the inauguration will go on with or without him.”
Under the Assumption of the Office of President Act, once the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) declares a winner and the Supreme Court affirms it, the handover must proceed. If the outgoing president boycotts the ceremony, his absence won’t invalidate the transition.
If Ruto refuses to hand over the ceremonial sword and Constitution — symbols of executive authority — he will become the first Kenyan leader since independence in 1963 to flout this democratic ritual.
A presidency under pressure?
Analysts say behind Ruto’s bravado lies a growing sense of unease ahead of the next election. The economy is teetering under the weight of public debt and high cost of living, protests are surging, and a more unified opposition is beginning to emerge.
Ruto may have delivered on some key policy interventions, but poor communications, economic pain, and police brutality have made him deeply unpopular
His former deputy, Rigathi Gachagua, has teamed up with political heavyweights including Kalonzo Musyoka, Eugene Wamalwa, Martha Karua and Fred Matiang’i to forge a united front. Gachagua was quick to respond to the president’s remarks: “It’s good that Ruto has admitted he will be ousted,” he told a rally in Kirinyaga county.
At the same time, Ruto allies have made public comments that further inflamed concerns. “Even if he does not get enough votes, we shall add him more,” said Oscar Sudi, MP for Kapseret. Senate majority leader Aaron Cheruiyot added, “It is our responsibility to uphold the tradition of two-term presidencies.”
The rhetoric has raised fears that the 2027 election may not be fought on a level playing field or respected if lost.
The Gen-Z factor
For many young Kenyans, Ruto’s words seem to confirm a broader shift away from democratic norms. On 17 June—the same day he made his remarks—police opened fire on peaceful Gen-Z protesters in Nairobi, following the death in custody of 31-year-old blogger Albert Ojwang. Shocking footage, including a protester being shot at close range, quickly went viral.
Kenya is a constitutional democracy, not your empire
Amnesty International Kenya called it “a dark day for the right to protest”, accusing the state of deploying “violent groups with support from the very authorities meant to protect us”.
Gachagua condemned the brutality, calling it “one of the lowest moments in our post-independence history”, and accused Ruto of turning Kenya into “a pariah state”.
The protests are the latest expression of youth-led frustration over rising inequality, police brutality and the president’s perceived betrayal of his 2022 campaign promises.
After the 2024 Finance Bill protests, Ruto sought détente with veteran opposition leader Raila Odinga, co-opting parts of his ODM party into government. But even Raila’s support or silence may not be enough to rescue the president’s battered image. ODM Secretary-General Edwin Sifuna is among those unconvinced that an alliance would help. “Ruto has lost the people. Even if Raila supports him, he will still lose,” Sifuna said.
Analysts agree that the opposition still lacks cohesion, but say a credible challenger like Matiang’i, the former interior minister, could mount a serious campaign. “Ruto may have delivered on some key policy interventions,” says political analyst Dismas Mokua, “but poor communications, economic pain, and police brutality have made him deeply unpopular”.
A stress test for Kenyan democracy
Ruto’s comments may have been intended to project strength, but many say it instead exposed his growing vulnerability.
With the economy fragile, opposition unity on the rise and youth protests building momentum, the real question is no longer just whether Ruto can win a second term but whether Kenya’s democracy can survive the pressure.
“Ruto has shot himself in the foot,” says governance expert Torosterdt Alenga. “It’s clear the handover of power could be contested. His allies are rattled and for good reason. 2027 is no longer a sure thing.”
Business
US Threatens New Tariffs on UK, EU, China, 57 Others
US Threatens New Tariffs on UK, EU, China, 57 Others
The United States has announced plans to impose fresh tariffs of between 10 and 12.5 per cent on imports from dozens of countries over concerns that they have failed to do enough to curb the trade in goods produced through forced labour.
The move marks the second major tariff initiative by the administration of President Donald Trump since the US Supreme Court struck down a significant portion of his earlier import duties in February.
According to the US Trade Department, the proposed tariffs would affect 60 trading partners that collectively account for almost all goods imported into the United States.
The department said the measures were aimed at countries that have either failed to prohibit the importation of goods made with forced labour or have not effectively enforced existing restrictions.
Announcing the proposal, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the continued trade in goods linked to forced labour created unfair competition for American workers.
“It creates a dynamic where American workers are forced to compete globally on an unlevel playing field,” Greer stated.
The proposed tariffs have yet to take effect, as the Trump administration is expected to complete the necessary legal and regulatory processes before implementation.
The action follows an investigation launched in March by Greer into whether major US trading partners had taken adequate measures to prevent the importation of products made wholly or partly through forced labour.
Findings from the investigation indicated that 54 countries had “failed to impose a legal prohibition on the importation of goods produced wholly or in part with forced labour and to effectively enforce such a prohibition.”
The report further stated that six trading partners — the European Union, Canada, Ecuador, Indonesia, Mexico and Pakistan — had failed to effectively enforce existing bans on imports linked to forced labour.
Under the proposal, a 10 per cent tariff would be imposed on imports from countries and blocs including the European Union, United Kingdom, Canada, Mexico, Pakistan, Argentina, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Guatemala, Malaysia and Taiwan.
The remaining 45 countries, including China and India, would face higher duties of 12.5 per cent.
Reacting to the announcement, the British government maintained that it was taking steps to address forced labour concerns within supply chains, while China rejected allegations that goods produced through forced labour were entering global markets.
The European Union, however, described the proposed tariffs as unjustified.
An Indian trade analyst characterised the move as a pressure tactic aimed at strengthening Washington’s position in ongoing trade negotiations with New Delhi.
News
Israeli Airstrikes Hit Beirut, Kill Two Despite Fragile Ceasefire
Israeli Airstrikes Hit Beirut, Kill Two Despite Fragile Ceasefire
Israel on Sunday launched airstrikes on southern Beirut, marking the first attack on the Lebanese capital since a ceasefire brokered by the United States last week, as tensions between Israel, Hezbollah and Iran continued to escalate.
Lebanon’s Ministry of Health said two people were killed and at least 20 others injured, including women and children, after Israeli warplanes struck two apartment buildings in Beirut’s southern suburb of Dahieh, a stronghold of the Iran-backed Hezbollah movement.
The strikes came amid renewed hostilities following a wave of missile attacks launched by Iran against Israel on Sunday night, which Tehran said was retaliation for increasing Israeli military operations in southern Lebanon and the outskirts of Beirut.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended the attacks, saying the targets were Hezbollah facilities operating within the Lebanese capital.
“We struck terrorist headquarters in the Dahieh district of Beirut in response to Hezbollah’s firing at Israeli territory,” Netanyahu said.
The latest bombardment shattered the lower floors of a residential building, leaving apartments exposed and scattering debris, concrete and twisted metal across nearby streets.
Videos circulating on social media showed residents and emergency responders rushing to the scene to rescue victims trapped beneath the rubble.
Health officials in Lebanon confirmed that four women and four children were among those injured in the attack.
An Arabic-language statement issued by an Israeli military spokesman on X indicated that the operation could continue, describing the targeted sites as Hezbollah military infrastructure.
“To be continued,” the spokesman wrote.
The Israeli military also announced that it intercepted two projectiles fired from Lebanon into Israeli territory earlier on Sunday.
Hezbollah later claimed responsibility for rocket attacks targeting Israeli artillery positions at Yiftah Barracks and troops stationed near al-Marj Pond.
The group said the attacks were carried out in response to what it described as repeated Israeli violations of the ceasefire and continued assaults on villages in southern Lebanon.
Reacting to the Beirut strikes, Iranian lawmaker and foreign policy committee spokesman Ebrahim Rezaie warned that Israel would face consequences.
He said Iran would deliver a “decisive and painful response” to the attack.
The renewed violence threatens a fragile truce reached on June 3 after intense diplomatic efforts led by Washington and supported by Qatar.
Prior to the ceasefire, Israel had threatened a major offensive in Dahieh, prompting thousands of residents to flee the area and triggering urgent diplomatic interventions aimed at preventing a wider regional conflict.
United States President Donald Trump had previously announced that there would be “no troops going to Beirut” following discussions with Netanyahu, while Washington reportedly urged Israel to exercise restraint.
News
Iran Launches Fresh Missile Barrage on Israel, Vows “Full Week of Continuous Strikes”
Iran Launches Fresh Missile Barrage on Israel, Vows “Full Week of Continuous Strikes”
Iran has fired multiple waves of missiles towards northern Israel in a sharp escalation of regional tensions, with Tehran warning that the attacks mark “the beginning of a full week of continuous strikes.”
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said the operation would continue in waves, signalling a prolonged confrontation as fears grow of a wider Middle East conflict.
However, most of the incoming missiles were reportedly intercepted by Israel’s air defence systems, with authorities later allowing residents to leave shelters. No immediate casualties were reported.
The Israeli military said it is prepared for a forceful response, with its chief of staff warning that the country would “strike the enemy with determination as soon as the order is given.”
A military spokesman also described Iran’s action as a “grave mistake,” amid mounting pressure on Israel’s leadership to respond decisively.
The latest exchange follows earlier Israeli strikes on Hezbollah-linked targets in southern Beirut, a move that further inflamed regional tensions and raised expectations of retaliation from Iran and its allies.
The developments have intensified concerns over the widening scope of the conflict across multiple fronts in the Middle East.
According to reports from Fox News, United States President Donald Trump urged Iran to de-escalate, saying: “That’s enough. Get back to the table.”
He was also quoted as expressing displeasure over Israel’s strikes in Beirut, telling the network he was “not happy” about the escalation.
-
Diaspora7 days agoBCD Fashion House Presents The World Cup Fashion Show and Gala
-
News3 days agoPeter Obi, US County Executive, Family Pay Tributes as Dr. Jude Onyegbado Is Laid to Rest
-
News3 days agoIran Launches Fresh Missile Barrage on Israel, Vows “Full Week of Continuous Strikes”
-
Analysis3 days agoCommercialisation of Banditry and Its Consequences for Nigeria, by Boniface Ihiasota
-
News3 days agoRamaphosa Unveils Tough New Migration Crackdown Amid Rising Xenophobic Attacks
-
News3 days agoIsraeli Airstrikes Hit Beirut, Kill Two Despite Fragile Ceasefire
