Connect with us

News

The Hypocrisy Of Western Human Rights Organizations: A Tale Of Two Protests

Published

on

The Hypocrisy Of Western Human Rights Organizations: A Tale Of Two Protests

As the streets of London descend into chaos following the killing of three children, the UK Prime Minister, Kier Starmer, has responded with a stern warning to protesters, labeling them “violent thugs.” Meanwhile, Amnesty International, a organization notorious for its vocal condemnation of African governments, remains eerily silent. This blatant double standard raises questions about the sincerity of Western human rights organizations and their selective treatment of protests in the West versus those in Africa.

In Nigeria and Kenya, similar protests have been met with swift condemnation from Amnesty International and other Western-driven rights groups. African leaders who dare to respond with firmness are vilified, and their governments are threatened with sanctions and diplomatic isolation. However, when protests turn violent in the UK, the same organizations are conspicuous in their silence.

This hypocrisy is a stark reminder of the deep-seated bias that pervades the human rights community. It is a bias that dictates that African lives are less valuable, and African governments are less deserving of respect. But it is also a wake-up call for African countries to take control of their own destiny.

African nations must prioritize good governance, effective institutions, and self-reliance in science and technology. A strong economy and a robust infrastructure will command respect from the global community. No longer can Africa be held hostage by the whims of Western powers and their NGOs.

However, this is not to say that the rights of protesters in the UK should not be protected. The authorities must listen to their demands and address the grievances that have led to this unrest. The UK government must recognize that the protesters are not just “violent thugs” but citizens who deserve to be heard.

In conclusion, the hypocrisy of Western human rights organizations is a stark reminder of the work that needs to be done. Africa must rise to the challenge and demand respect. The UK government must protect the rights of its citizens and listen to their demands. Only then can we hope for a more just and equitable world. Kelvin Obatala writes from Cape Town, South Africa

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

NEWS – Diaspora Watch

Published

on

News - Diaspora Watch

Australia Gets Its First Female Army Chief, Susan Coyle.

Susan Coyle, currently chief of joint capabilities, is the first woman to be appointed head of any of the services in the Australian military.

Australia will get its first female chief of army, with the appointment of Lieutenant General Susan Coyle to the post. Coyle, currently chief of joint capabilities, is the first woman to be appointed head of any of the services in the Australian military.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced the appointments of new military chiefs on Monday, ahead of the government unveiling its 2026 statement on defense strategy and investment later this week. The appointments commence in July.

The current Navy Chief, Vice Admiral Mark Hammond, will become the new Chief of the Defence Force, replacing Admiral David Johnston.

Hammond has commanded submarines and the Australian fleet. He has been the Chief of the Navy since 2022. As the second naval officer in a row to serve as chief of the Australian Defence Force (ADF), his expertise is particularly relevant as Australia deals with the AUKUS agreement.

Coyle, who enlisted in the Army Reserves in 1987, has worked at the tactical, operational and strategic levels and in command roles. These include the commander of the Task Group Afghanistan and the commanding officer of the 17th Signal Regiment. She replaces Lieutenant General Stuart as Army Chief.

Continue Reading

News

CARICOM backs UN resolution recognising slavery as crime against humanity

Published

on

CARICOM backs UN resolution recognising slavery as crime against humanity

 

The CARICOM Reparations Commission has commended the adoption of a United Nations resolution recognising the trafficking and racialised chattel enslavement of Africans as the gravest crime against humanity.

 

Chairman of the commission, Hilary Beckles, described the resolution as a long-overdue milestone that provides a foundation for global engagement on justice and human dignity.

 

Speaking during a virtual media conference on March 7, Beckles called for sustained dialogue between nations that benefited from slavery and those still grappling with its legacy.

 

He said, “We’re calling for a dialogue of decency that is part of the discourse of development. Those who have benefited from the criminality of this system ought to engage the victims…to discuss how best to repair and move forward.”

 

The resolution, led by Ghana, was adopted on March 25, coinciding with the International Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Slavery and the Transatlantic Slave Trade, with 123 countries voting in support.

 

Beckles emphasised that the development marked a significant step in advancing justice and reconciliation for descendants of enslaved Africans, noting that reparatory justice must form part of broader development discussions.

 

“In the CARICOM Reparations Commission, we are of the view that reparatory justice is part of our development conversation… it is about repairing the economic, social and cultural resources necessary for human development,” he added.

 

He further highlighted the collaborative efforts between the African Union and CARICOM in pushing the agenda over the years, describing the resolution as the culmination of decades of advocacy.

 

According to him, the global position on slavery has evolved significantly since the 2001 Durban conference, where it was first proposed that chattel slavery be recognised as a crime against humanity.

 

“We have now moved from ‘should have been a crime’ to it being recognised as the gravest crime against humanity. The world is much more united on this matter now than it was then,” Beckles said.

 

He added that the resolution places the issue of slavery and its enduring impact within the proper context of human development, paving the way for deeper international cooperation on reparatory justice.

 

Continue Reading

News

Starmer Shelves Chagos Islands Deal Amid Trump Opposition 

Published

on

Starmer Shelves Chagos Islands Deal Amid Trump Opposition 

 

British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has shelved the proposed Chagos Islands sovereignty deal following deteriorating relations with United States President Donald Trump and the absence of formal US approval required to finalise the agreement.

 

The controversial pact, which would have transferred sovereignty of the British Indian Ocean Territory to Mauritius, stalled after Washington failed to complete a legally required exchange of letters confirming its backing.

 

Officials said without the document, the treaty cannot proceed.

 

The deal, signed in May 2025, also included provisions for the UK to lease back the strategic military base on Diego Garcia for an average cost of £101m annually.

 

However, growing political resistance in Washington and Trump’s public criticism—calling it an “act of total weakness”—have complicated its implementation.

 

The islands, located in the Indian Ocean, host a key UK-US military installation regarded as vital to Western strategic interests.

 

While UK officials insist the arrangement was designed to secure long-term operational stability, they acknowledged time has run out to pass the enabling legislation before Parliament is prorogued.

 

A government spokesperson maintained that the agreement was not entirely dead, stressing that it remains the “best way” to safeguard the future of the Diego Garcia base.

 

However, they added that the deal would only proceed with explicit US support, with discussions still ongoing between London, Washington and Port Louis.

 

The opposition Conservative Party welcomed the suspension, with leader Kemi Badenoch describing the plan as misguided and economically unjustifiable, while arguing that national interest should take precedence over diplomatic pressure.

 

Meanwhile, former Foreign Office official Lord Simon McDonald said the government had “no other choice” given the breakdown in transatlantic consensus.

 

Mauritius has reacted cautiously, with Attorney General Gavin Glover saying the delay reflected strained UK-US relations but insisting the agreement could still be revived in future.

 

Chagossian groups, however, continue to express concern over their long-standing exclusion from the islands and uncertainty over their right of return.

Continue Reading

Trending