Connect with us

News

Iran, US Exchange Threats Despite Ceasefire Negotiations

Published

on

Iran, US Exchange Threats Despite Ceasefire Negotiations

 

The standoff between Iran and the United States deepened on Sunday as Tehran confirmed it had submitted a formal response to Washington’s latest proposals aimed at ending the months-long war that has destabilised the Middle East and rattled global oil markets.

 

The development came amid fresh threats from both sides, with Iranian leaders warning neighbouring Gulf states against cooperating with American sanctions while US President Donald Trump declared that Tehran would no longer be allowed to “play games”.

 

Pakistan’s Prime Minister, Shehbaz Sharif, whose country has reportedly been mediating between the warring parties, disclosed that Islamabad had received Iran’s response but declined to reveal details of the document or whether it had already been transmitted to Washington.

 

The latest diplomatic manoeuvres unfolded against the backdrop of a fragile ceasefire brokered to facilitate negotiations after the war launched jointly by the United States and Israel against Iran in February.

 

Although the ceasefire has largely held, sporadic exchanges of fire and threats of escalation have continued to fuel fears of a broader regional conflict.

 

US media outlet Axios reported that Washington’s proposal was contained in a one-page, 14-point memo outlining sweeping conditions for ending hostilities.

 

According to the report, the proposals include suspension of Iran’s uranium enrichment programme, the lifting of sanctions on Tehran, and restoration of free navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic waterway through which nearly one-fifth of global oil and gas supplies pass daily.

 

The report, citing unnamed American officials and sources familiar with the negotiations, stated that several conditions would only take effect after a comprehensive final agreement was reached.

 

Iran’s semi-official ISNA news agency, however, said Tehran’s response focused primarily on “ending the war and maritime security” in the Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz.

 

The comments underscored Iran’s continued determination to leverage its control of the waterway despite mounting international pressure.

 

Iran has maintained restrictions in the Strait of Hormuz, a move that has triggered spikes in global oil prices and heightened anxiety in international energy markets.

 

Washington, in turn, has intensified pressure on Tehran through a naval blockade targeting Iranian ports, further inflaming tensions between both countries.

 

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, while avoiding direct mention of the American proposal, insisted that Iran would not capitulate under pressure.

 

“We will never bow our heads before the enemy, and if talk of dialogue or negotiation arises, it does not mean surrender or retreat,” Pezeshkian declared on Sunday.

 

Trump, however, maintained a combative posture, insisting the conflict would soon end on American terms.

 

In a fiery post on his Truth Social platform, the US president accused Iran of decades of hostility against Washington and vowed that Tehran’s actions would no longer go unanswered.

 

“For 47 years the Iranians have been ‘tapping’ us along, keeping us waiting, killing our people with their roadside bombs, destroying protests… They will be laughing no longer,” Trump wrote.

 

The American president’s remarks came as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu demanded tougher conditions before any declaration that the war was over.

 

Netanyahu said Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium must be dismantled completely, insisting that several enrichment facilities remained operational.

 

“There’s still enrichment sites that have to be dismantled,” the Israeli leader said in an interview excerpt released ahead of a CBS “60 Minutes” broadcast.

 

The increasingly hardline rhetoric from Washington and Tel Aviv has provoked alarm across the Gulf region.

 

Iran on Sunday warned neighbouring countries against aligning with US sanctions or military efforts, threatening “severe consequences” for vessels crossing the Strait of Hormuz without Tehran’s cooperation.

 

Military spokesman Mohammad Akraminia dismissed American naval operations in the region, saying the US would “never be able to turn this vast expanse into a real blockade”.

The threats heightened fears of disruptions to international shipping as Tehran intensified warnings against Western military deployments.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Diplomacy

CARICOM, Türkiye explore cooperation in trade, energy, food security

Published

on

CARICOM, Türkiye explore cooperation in trade, energy, food security

 

The Caribbean Community, CARICOM and the Republic of Türkiye have explored opportunities to strengthen cooperation in trade, investment, food security, renewable energy, disaster management and maritime connectivity.

 

The two sides also identified health, port development and climate resilience as priority areas for deeper engagement during the second meeting of the CARICOM-Republic of Türkiye Consultation and Cooperation Mechanism held on October 12, 2026.

 

According to a joint press release, the meeting reaffirmed both parties’ commitment to strengthening political dialogue and advancing practical cooperation in areas of mutual interest.

 

The meeting was co-chaired by the Permanent Secretary in Suriname’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Business and Cooperation, Ambassador Miriam Mac Intosh, and Türkiye’s Director-General for Latin America and the Caribbean in its Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Erkan Aytun.

 

Mac Intosh, who represents the current chair of the CARICOM Council for Foreign and Community Relations, said the partnership was founded on constructive dialogue, mutual respect and a shared commitment to development.

 

She commended Türkiye for its support for development projects and humanitarian assistance across the Caribbean, noting that the contributions had delivered tangible benefits to the region.

 

“We remain committed to identifying and advancing further initiatives that contribute to the Region’s resilience and sustainable development,” she said.

 

Convened under a memorandum of understanding signed in 2011, the meeting reviewed developments in relations between the two parties and examined opportunities to expand cooperation.

 

High-level officials from CARICOM member states presented practical proposals covering trade and investment, disaster management, food security, renewable energy, health, maritime connectivity and port development.

 

Representatives of Turkish institutions also outlined how their technical expertise, technology and institutional capacity could support the priorities of Caribbean countries.

 

The discussions further examined preparations for the 31st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, known as COP31, scheduled to take place in Antalya, Türkiye, from November 9 to 20, 2026.

 

Türkiye, which will preside over the conference, presented its strategic priorities and preparations for the global climate summit.

 

Aytun said the country wanted COP31 to focus on implementing climate commitments, following consultations with participating countries and other stakeholders.

 

“We need to make COP31 an implementation COP,” he said.

 

He identified 10 priority themes for the climate action agenda, including clean energy transition and electrification, zero waste and methane reduction, climate-resilient cities, green industrialisation, youth and education, food security, oceans and seas, resilient health systems, synergies among the Rio conventions and a climate implementation bridge.

 

CARICOM and Türkiye have expanded their engagement over the years through development cooperation, humanitarian assistance and support for regional initiatives.

 

Recent areas of cooperation include contributions to Caribbean disaster recovery efforts, support for the Caribbean Development Fund and assistance in strengthening the CARICOM Secretariat’s information and communications infrastructure.

Continue Reading

News

Britain restricts Eritrean diplomats, threatens entry ban

Published

on

Britain restricts Eritrean diplomats, threatens entry ban

 

The United Kingdom has threatened to impose a blanket entry ban on Eritrean nationals if the East African country fails to cooperate with efforts to return migrants who have no legal right to remain in Britain and foreign nationals convicted of crimes.

 

The UK Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, announced the proposed measures amid growing tensions between both countries over migration and the repatriation of Eritrean nationals.

 

From Thursday, Eritrean diplomats will face restrictions on their movements outside London, while fast-track visa arrangements for senior officials will be suspended.

 

Mahmood warned that the British government could introduce further restrictions if Eritrean authorities continued to reject its requests for cooperation.

 

“Eritrea has had every chance to accept the return of criminals and those with no right to be in the UK. Unlike other countries, it has refused,” she said.

 

She added that she would not hesitate “to impose further measures on other countries refusing to co-operate”.

 

The British government accused Eritrea of abruptly withdrawing cooperation earlier this year, making it difficult to return nationals who had been denied permission to remain in the UK.

 

However, Eritrea’s government rejected the allegations, describing the restrictions as a “perfunctory political gimmick”.

 

The Eritrean embassy in London also accused Britain of failing to engage in meaningful dialogue and alleged that British authorities had not properly disclosed cases involving nationals who were returned while still serving prison sentences.

 

It further disputed Britain’s description of some returns as voluntary, arguing that the circumstances did not support that characterisation.

 

A UK Home Office spokesperson dismissed the criticism, saying Eritrea’s comments misrepresented the British government’s position.

 

The Home Office also said Britain had granted an exemption from immigration control to an Eritrean official in August 2026, disputing claims that no Eritrean official had received such an exemption since 2023.

 

The proposed restrictions come as Eritreans account for a significant proportion of migrants arriving in Britain through irregular Channel crossings.

 

Figures from the House of Commons Library show that Eritreans represented 18 per cent of small-boat arrivals in the 12 months to June.

 

Home Office data indicated that more than 5,800 Eritreans arrived in Britain through small boats during the same period, while approximately 1,300 were granted visas, mostly to join relatives already living in the country.

 

Only seven Eritrean nationals were returned directly to Eritrea from Britain during the 12 months to June, while another 244 were returned to other countries.

 

The figures have raised questions about the likely effectiveness of the proposed restrictions in reducing irregular migration.

 

Dr Madeleine Sumption, director of the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford, said targeting Eritrea could have limited impact because most Eritreans seeking asylum in Britain were likely to qualify for international protection.

 

She told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that Eritrea accounted for approximately 7,000 asylum applications in the latest year of available data, representing about eight per cent of the total.

 

“Most Eritreans who come and claim asylum are not removable at all,” she said, adding that about 84 per cent of applications were successful at the initial decision stage, with further applicants potentially succeeding on appeal.

 

Sumption said the number of people initially refused asylum would decline as appeals were considered.

 

Eritrea has faced longstanding international criticism over its human rights record, including allegations of forced labour, indefinite military conscription and restrictions on freedom of expression.

 

The country, which gained independence from Ethiopia in 1993, has never held a national election since independence and has no independent media.

 

Human Rights Watch has accused the government of widespread repression, while critics of President Isaias Afwerki have faced arrest and prolonged detention, often without trial.

 

Indefinite military service has also been cited as a major reason young Eritreans leave the country.

Continue Reading

News

Zelenskyy seeks European support as Trump tensions deepen

Published

on

Zelensky: Trump Would Be Hard Work, But We Are Hard Workers

Zelenskyy seeks European support as Trump tensions deepen

 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has praised European leaders for their continued support for Kyiv as tensions with United States President Donald Trump threaten to complicate efforts to secure further assistance for Ukraine.

 

Zelenskyy made the remarks on Friday during a European summit in Brussels, where leaders were discussing support for Ukraine amid its continuing war with Russia.

 

“I’m so thankful that we have such huge support from EU Council Commission and leaders – real leaders,” he said, acknowledging Europe’s backing since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

 

His comments came amid renewed concerns over Ukraine’s military communications following restrictions on SpaceX’s Starlink satellite service, which Ukrainian forces rely on for battlefield connectivity.

 

Ukraine’s First Deputy Minister for Recovery, Infrastructure and Transport, Serhiy Derkach, warned that restrictions on the service could create additional difficulties for the country’s defence efforts.

 

“With U.S. limiting the use of Starlinks on the battlefield, Russia feels that this is their moment to try and inflict even more pain and suffering on Ukraine’s civilian infrastructure,” Derkach told CNBC on Friday.

 

He added that Ukraine was approaching what could be a particularly difficult period and needed support from its international partners.

 

The development comes as Zelenskyy reportedly faces pressure from some European officials to moderate his public criticism of Trump in order to preserve cooperation with Washington.

 

Three officials familiar with preparations for the Brussels summit told the Financial Times that they planned to privately urge the Ukrainian president to tone down his rhetoric during their meeting.

 

Politico also reported concerns among some European leaders about Zelenskyy’s handling of his strained relationship with the US president.

 

One European Union diplomat was quoted as describing the Ukrainian leader’s public criticism of Trump as “not helpful”.

 

Despite the tensions, Zelenskyy insisted that Ukraine remained committed to ending the war but said there were no indications that Russia was ready to do the same.

 

“We want to end this war as quick as possible. We don’t see now signals from Russia side that they are ready for this to end this war,” he told reporters in Brussels.

 

The Ukrainian president’s comments followed his criticism of Russia over its alleged failure to respect an energy ceasefire announced by Trump.

 

Trump had announced the proposed arrangement the previous week, saying Russia and Ukraine had agreed to stop attacking each other’s energy infrastructure.

 

The initiative was presented as an attempt to reduce attacks on critical infrastructure and ease pressure on energy markets ahead of the US midterm elections in November.

 

Zelenskyy subsequently said Ukraine had refrained from striking Russian energy targets for three days in response to Washington’s proposal.

 

However, he described the arrangement concerning Russia’s energy-related commitments as weak.

 

Moscow has not confirmed that it agreed to an energy ceasefire, saying only that discussions were ongoing.

 

Russian authorities had not responded to multiple requests for comment from CNBC at the time of the report.

 

The dispute highlights the challenges facing diplomatic efforts to reduce hostilities, particularly as Ukraine continues to depend on Western military, financial and technological assistance.

 

European governments have maintained support for Kyiv, but concerns over the relationship between Zelenskyy and Trump have raised questions about how differences between Ukraine and its most influential partners could affect the wider war effort.

Continue Reading

Trending