Connect with us

News

Time To End Herders’ Killings In Nigeria Is Now

Published

on

 The persistent conflict between herders and farming communities in Nigeria has resulted in the loss of thousands of lives over the past decade. This crisis has primarily affected the Middle Belt and Northern regions, but it is now spreading into the South.

The urgency to end the herder-related killings cannot be overstated. It is not only a humanitarian imperative but also essential for Nigeria’s national stability and economic development.

According to the United Nations, desertification affects more than 60% of Nigeria’s land area, forcing pastoralists primarily Fulani herders to migrate south- ward in search of pasture. This migration often leads to clashes with farming communities over land and resources. With Nigeria’s population currently exceeding 220 mil- lion and projected to double by 2050, competition for land and resources will only intensify.

Weak state institutions, the proliferation of small arms, ethnic and religious tensions, and the failure of law enforcement to hold perpetrators accountable have all exacerbated the crisis. A 2022 Small Arms Survey estimated that Time To End Herders’ Killings In Nigeria Is Now over 6 million small arms are in civilian hands in Nigeria, further fueling the violence.

The killings have devastated rural communities. Nigerians in the diaspora, many of whom have roots in the affected areas, are heartbroken as they witness their kinsmen slaughtered by rampaging criminals and armed herd- ers in states such as Benue, Plateau, and Enugu. Despite repeated government assurances, there appears to be little real progress in addressing the insecurity.

According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED), over 8,000 people have been killed in herder-farmer related violence between 2011 and 2023. In 2018 alone, more than 1,600 lives were lost in such clashes surpassing the number of deaths caused by Boko Ha- ram that year.

A report by the SBM intelligence titled “A National Emergency: The Escalating Crisis of Pastoral Violence in Nigeria, reads in part:

The geographical pattern of pastoral violence in Nigeria paints a troubling picture of relentless expansion. Between 2019 and 2025, the North-Central zone remained the most severely affected region, with Benue State enduring over 200 documented attacks, cementng its grim reputation as the epicenter of the crisis.”

“Neighbor- ing Plateau State followed closely with 150 incidents. Their shared border has transformed into a deadly conflict zone, exemplified by the May 2023 massacre in Mangu, which left 80 people dead, followed seven months later by the Christmas Eve atrocity in Bokkos, which claimed 140 lives.”

“The violence spread out- ward along predictable path- ways. Kaduna in the North- west recorded concerning numbers of attacks, while Adamawa in the Northeast displayed increasing vulnerability.”

The International Crisis Group reports that the violence has displaced hundreds of thousands of people, while a 2020 World Bank report estimated that Nigeria loses $13.7 billion annually due to agricultural disruptions caused by the conflict.

Despite widespread media coverage and public outcry, the Nigerian government has been slow and ineffective in addressing the crisis. Be- yond a lack of accountability, the country’s security forces are overstretched. With a police-to-citizen ratio of ap- proximately 1:540—below the UN’s recommended 1:450— there is an urgent need to strengthen local policing. Establishing mobile courts in conflict-prone areas could also enhance justice delivery and deter future violence.

Political neutrality is critical in resolving this crisis. The weaponization of ethnic identities and politicization of security issues only worsen the situation. National unity and strong political will are essential.

The killings must stop. Nigeria cannot continue to lose lives, homes, and futures to a crisis that is both prevent- able and solvable. With the right mix of policy, enforcement, empathy, and account- ability, peace is achievable. The cost of inaction is sim- ply too high.

Even remittances from Nigerians abroad thrive better in a stable environment. The Nigerian government must demonstrate that it is ready and able to fulfill its primary responsibility: protecting the lives and property of its citizens. The time to act is now for the sake of unity, stability, and the future of Nigeria.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Irish Government Jet Takes Suspected Crime Boss Kinahan Back to Dublin

Published

on

Irish Government Jet Takes Suspected Crime Boss Kinahan Back to Dublin

 

The Irish government jet conveying suspected organised crime boss, Daniel Kinahan, has departed Dubai for Dublin, where he is expected to face a charge of directing a criminal organisation.

 

Kinahan, 49, was arrested in the United Arab Emirates in April following an extradition request from Ireland and is being returned to the country to face prosecution.

 

Flight tracking data showed that the government aircraft conveying him departed Dubai at 1:19pm local time on Sunday and was expected to arrive in Dublin before 7pm.

 

Upon arrival, Kinahan is expected to be formally charged before being taken into custody by members of the Irish police, known as gardaí, for an appearance before the Special Criminal Court.

 

The non-jury court, which comprises three judges, is expected to hear the case on Sunday evening amid a major security operation surrounding his return.

 

Irish authorities have deployed armed gardaí, members of the Irish Defence Forces and personnel from the Irish Prison Service for the operation.

 

The Irish Prison Service had also acquired a bulletproof and bombproof vehicle ahead of the extradition to facilitate the movement of prisoners considered to pose a high security risk.

 

Kinahan is expected to arrive at Casement Aerodrome in Baldonnel, Dublin, before being transferred to custody.

 

Irish broadcaster RTÉ News reported that security arrangements had been intensified ahead of his arrival, while facilities at the maximum-security Portlaoise Prison in County Laois had also been upgraded in anticipation of his detention on remand.

 

Kinahan has spent months challenging efforts to extradite him from the UAE to Ireland, but his appeals were unsuccessful.

 

His extradition has been welcomed by the governments of Ireland and the UAE, which have described the development as evidence of growing judicial cooperation between the two countries.

 

Irish Justice Minister, Jim O’Callaghan, described the extradition as a “landmark of judicial cooperation” between Ireland and the UAE.

 

O’Callaghan also commended the UAE judicial authorities for what he described as their professionalism, efficiency and diligence throughout the extradition proceedings.

 

His UAE counterpart, Abdullah bin Sultan bin Awad Al Nuaimi, said the case demonstrated the UAE’s commitment to international efforts to combat transnational organised crime.

 

The extradition was made possible under an existing agreement between Ireland and the UAE.

 

The agreement had previously been used to extradite Sean McGovern, described by authorities as a senior lieutenant in the Kinahan organised crime group. McGovern was sentenced to 24 years in prison in June after being convicted of directing the activities of a criminal organisation.

 

Kinahan cartel

 

Irish and international law enforcement agencies have for years linked Kinahan to the Kinahan organised crime group, which authorities accuse of involvement in international drug trafficking, firearms trafficking and gangland violence.

 

The UK National Crime Agency has previously alleged that the group was responsible for importing tonnes of drugs and firearms across the world and had links to more than a dozen gangland murders.

 

Former Garda Commissioner Drew Harris estimated that the organisation had generated more than €1bn globally through its criminal activities.

 

The United States Treasury Department in 2022 imposed sanctions on Kinahan and other members of his family after identifying them as leaders of what it described as the Kinahan organised crime cartel.

 

US authorities have also compared the organisation with major international criminal groups including Italy’s Camorra, Mexico’s Los Zetas and Japan’s Yakuza.

 

A reward of up to $5m was subsequently offered by the US authorities for information leading to the arrest or conviction of the three senior figures associated with the organisation: Daniel Kinahan, his father, Christopher Kinahan Snr, 65, and his brother, Christopher Kinahan Jnr.

 

Kinahan became a target in a long-running gangland feud in Ireland and survived an assassination attempt at Dublin’s Regency Hotel in 2016.

 

The attack, which occurred during a boxing weigh-in, intensified a feud between rival criminal groups that authorities have linked to 18 deaths.

 

Kinahan subsequently left Ireland and lived in Spain before relocating to Dubai.

 

Meanwhile, the NCA has previously prosecuted several alleged associates of the organisation in the United Kingdom.

 

In 2022, Thomas Kavanagh, whom the agency described as responsible for running the group’s criminal operations in Britain, was sentenced to 21 years in prison.

 

Gary Vickery and Daniel Canning were sentenced to 20 years and 19-and-a-half years respectively.

 

The NCA said evidence presented during the case showed that the men were involved in cocaine imports estimated at up to £23.4m and cannabis imports valued at about £6.4m.

 

Despite the allegations against him, Kinahan has denied being a crime boss.

 

His lawyer previously said Kinahan had no criminal record or convictions and maintained that allegations portraying him as a senior figure in organised crime were false and unsupported by evidence.

Continue Reading

News

Netanyahu Defies Trump?

Published

on

Netanyahu Defies Trump?

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected United States President Donald Trump’s 15-point Gaza peace plan, insisting that Israeli forces will not withdraw from the territory until Hamas is “genuinely” disarmed.

 

Netanyahu made the position known on Sunday during an Israeli cabinet meeting, dealing another setback to Trump’s efforts to secure a lasting ceasefire and political settlement in Gaza.

 

“Israel rejects the 15-point document,” Netanyahu said, adding that the Israeli military “will not carry out any withdrawal until Hamas is genuinely disarmed and will continue to thwart threats against our forces and our citizens.”

 

The Israeli leader’s declaration puts him at odds with the framework announced by Trump, which envisages the disarmament of Hamas and other armed groups, an Israeli military withdrawal and the reconstruction of the war-ravaged Gaza Strip.

 

Trump’s Board of Peace said last month that an agreement had been reached for the “complete disarmament” of Hamas and other armed groups operating in Gaza.

 

However, Hamas has maintained that surrendering its heavy weapons must be tied to an Israeli withdrawal and an end to what it described as “all forms of aggression” against Palestinians in the territory.

 

Israel has continued military strikes in Gaza despite agreeing to an initial ceasefire in October last year, with the dispute over disarmament and Israeli troop withdrawals emerging as one of the biggest obstacles to the implementation of the proposed peace framework.

 

Netanyahu said Israel would not accept what he described as a “fictitious disarmament” of Hamas, stressing that the group must be genuinely stripped of its military capability before Israeli forces leave.

 

He disclosed that discussions were ongoing between his government and American officials over the way forward, but indicated that significant differences remained.

 

“They have ideas; some of them are acceptable to us and some are not, and we know how to stand our ground on these matters,” Netanyahu said.

 

The Israeli prime minister’s rejection is likely to further complicate Trump’s attempt to implement the Gaza roadmap, which was unveiled in September last year as a comprehensive framework for ending the conflict and establishing a pathway towards reconstruction and long-term security.

 

Under the proposal, a Board of Peace would oversee implementation of the agreement, while Hamas and other armed groups would be disarmed, Israeli forces would withdraw and Gaza would undergo extensive reconstruction.

 

The latest development also comes at a politically sensitive period for Netanyahu, with Israeli elections approaching and pressure mounting from members of his far-right governing coalition to abandon or renegotiate the Gaza plan.

 

National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir has been among the most vocal critics, dismissing the draft agreement as “not acceptable” and urging Netanyahu to take a harder position.

 

Netanyahu’s insistence that Hamas must first be disarmed before any Israeli military withdrawal therefore reflects both the security demands of his government and the political pressure within his coalition.

 

The disagreement could place further strain on relations between Netanyahu and Trump, who has presented the Gaza initiative as a major diplomatic achievement and a potential pathway to lasting peace in the Middle East.

Continue Reading

News

Spain battles political fallout as 60,000 migrants overwhelm Ceuta border

Published

on

Spain battles political fallout as 60,000 migrants overwhelm Ceuta border

 

Spain is facing mounting political pressure after an estimated 60,000 migrants crossed from Morocco into the Spanish enclave of Ceuta within 24 hours, triggering one of the country’s worst border crises in recent years.

 

The unprecedented influx overwhelmed local infrastructure, forced businesses to shut down and disrupted daily life in the North African territory.

 

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez condemned the mass crossing, describing it as “a violation of Spain’s territorial integrity,” as security forces reinforced the border.

 

Residents expressed frustration over the scale of the influx, saying the territory lacked the resources to cope with such a large number of arrivals.

 

Although thousands of migrants have reportedly returned voluntarily to Morocco, officials said shortages of food and essential supplies continued to affect the enclave.

 

The crisis has also reignited political debate across Europe over border security and migration policy, with some politicians calling for tougher controls along the European Union’s external frontiers.

 

The humanitarian toll also continued to rise, with officials confirming that at least 57 people died during the border surge.

 

Many of those who crossed into Ceuta said they were fleeing unemployment and economic hardship in Morocco in search of better opportunities in Europe.

Continue Reading

Trending